...
首页> 外文期刊>Great Plains Research >Review of Prairie Populism: The Fate of Agrarian Radicalism in Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa, 1880-1892 by Jeffrey Ostler
【24h】

Review of Prairie Populism: The Fate of Agrarian Radicalism in Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa, 1880-1892 by Jeffrey Ostler

机译:杰弗里·奥斯特勒(Jeffrey Ostler)撰写的《大草原民粹主义:1880-1892年在堪萨斯州,内布拉斯加州和爱荷华州的农业激进主义的命运》

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Why was there no populism in Iowa? That is the question posed by Jeffrey Ostler, assistant professor of history at the University of Oregon, in this revised version of his dissertation. The question itself is more complicated than it might first seem, and Ostler's thoughtful and carefully-researched answers have interesting implications for the study of late 19th century politics more generally. Ostler approaches his question by comparing Iowa with Kansas and Nebraska. Arguing that the economic situation of farmers in the three states was not sufficiently different to explain the great dissimilarity in their support for the Populist Party in the 1890s, he demonstrates that the Farmers' Alliance developed comparable levels of strength in all three states. The key differences, he maintains, are to be found instead within the system of party politics within each state and the reception that the Alliance found in each state for its proposals.
机译:为什么爱荷华州没有民粹主义?这就是俄勒冈大学历史学助理教授杰弗里·奥斯特勒(Jeffrey Ostler)在其论文的修订版中提出的问题。这个问题本身比最初看起来要复杂得多,奥斯特勒的深思熟虑和经过仔细研究的答案对更广泛地研究19世纪末政治具有有趣的启示。奥斯特勒通过将爱荷华州与堪萨斯州和内布拉斯加州进行比较来解决他的问题。他认为这三个州的农民的经济状况差异不大,无法解释他们在1890年代对民粹党的支持上有很大的不同,他证明了农民联盟在这三个州的实力都相当。他坚持认为,关键的区别在于在每个州的政党政治体系内以及联盟在每个州为其提案所发现的接受度内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号