首页> 外文期刊>Globalization and Health >“If donors woke up tomorrow and said we can't fund you, what would we do?” A health system dynamics analysis of implementation of PMTCT option B+ in Uganda
【24h】

“If donors woke up tomorrow and said we can't fund you, what would we do?” A health system dynamics analysis of implementation of PMTCT option B+ in Uganda

机译:“如果捐助者明天醒来,说我们不能为您提供资金,那我们将怎么办?”在乌干达实施PMTCT方案B +的卫生系统动力学分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundIn October 2012 Uganda extended its prevention of mother to child HIV transmission (PMTCT) policy to Option B+, providing lifelong antiretroviral treatment for HIV positive pregnant and breastfeeding women. The rapid changes and adoptions of new PMTCT policies have not been accompanied by health systems research to explore health system preparedness to implement such programmes. The implementation of Option B+ provides many lessons which can inform the shift to ‘Universal Test and Treat’, a policy which many sub-Saharan African countries are preparing to adopt, despite fragile health systems. MethodsThis qualitative study of PMTCT Option B+ implementation in Uganda three years following the policy adoption, uses the health system dynamics framework to explore the impacts of this programme on ten elements of the health system. Qualitative data were gathered through rapid appraisal during in-country field work. Key informant interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) were undertaken with the Ministry of Health, implementing partners, multilateral agencies, district management teams, facility-based health workers and community cadres. A total of 82 individual interviews and 16 focus group discussions were completed. We conducted a simple manifest analysis, using the ten elements of a health system for grouping data into categories and themes. ResultsOf the ten elements in the health system dynamics framework, context and resources (finances, infrastructure & supplies, and human resources) were the most influential in the implementation of Option B+ in Uganda. Support from international actors and implementing partners attempted to strengthen resources at district level, but had unintended consequences of creating dependence and uncertainty regarding sustainability. ConclusionsThe health system dynamics framework offers a novel approach to analysis of the effects of implementation of a new policy on critical elements of the health system. Its emphasis on relationships between system elements, population and context is helpful in unpacking impacts of and reactions to pressures on the system, which adds value beyond some previous frameworks.
机译:背景技术2012年10月,乌干达将其预防母婴艾滋病毒传播(PMTCT)政策扩展到了方案B +,为艾滋病毒呈阳性的孕妇和哺乳期妇女提供终生抗逆转录病毒治疗。新的PMTCT政策的迅速变化和采用并没有伴随着卫生系统研究来探索卫生系统为实施此类计划的准备情况。方案B +的实施提供了许多经验教训,可以为向“普遍检验和治疗”的转变提供指导,尽管卫生系统脆弱,许多撒哈拉以南非洲国家仍在准备采用该政策。方法:这项对政策采用后三年在乌干达实施PMTCT Option B +的定性研究,使用卫生系统动力学框架探索该计划对卫生系统十要素的影响。定性数据是通过在国家野外工作期间进行的快速评估而收集的。与卫生部,执行伙伴,多边机构,地区管理团队,设施卫生工作者和社区干部进行了重要的线人访谈和焦点小组讨论。共完成了82次个人访谈和16次焦点小组讨论。我们使用卫生系统的十个要素进行了简单的清单分析,将数据分为类别和主题。结果在卫生系统动态框架的十个要素中,背景和资源(财务,基础设施和用品以及人力资源)对乌干达实施方案B +的影响最大。国际行动者和执行伙伴的支持试图在地区一级增加资源,但是却产生了对可持续性的依赖和不确定性带来的意想不到的后果。结论结论卫生系统动态框架提供了一种新颖的方法来分析实施新政策对卫生系统关键要素的影响。它强调系统元素,总体和上下文之间的关系,有助于揭示系统压力的影响和对系统压力的反应,这增加了一些先前框架的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号