首页> 外文期刊>Global spine journal. >Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionSurgery: An Analysis of Opioids, Nonopioid Analgesics, and PerioperativeCharacteristics
【24h】

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionSurgery: An Analysis of Opioids, Nonopioid Analgesics, and PerioperativeCharacteristics

机译:微创与开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合手术:阿片类药物,非阿片类镇痛药和围手术期特征分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Study Design: Retrospective study of consecutive patients at a single institution.Objective: Examine the effect of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery on long-term postoperative narcotic consumption. Objective: Examine the effect of minimally invasive versus open TLIF on short-term postoperative narcotic consumption. Methods: Differences between MIS and open TLIF, including inpatient opioid and nonopioid analgesic use, discharge opioid use, and postdischarge duration of narcotic usage were compared using appropriate statistical methods. Results: A total of 172 patients (109 open; 63 MIS) underwent primary TLIF. There was no difference in baseline characteristics. The MIS TLIF cohort had a significantly shorter operative time (223 vs 251 min, P = .006) and length of stay (2.7 vs 3.7 days, P .001) as well as less estimated blood loss (184 vs 648 mL, P .001). MIS TLIF had significantly less total inpatient opioid usage (167 vs 255 morphine milligram equivalent [MME], P = .006) and inpatient oxycodone usage (71 vs 105 mg, P = .049). Open TLIF cases required more ongoing opiate usage at 3-month follow-up (36% open vs 21% MIS, P = .041). A subanalysis found that patients who underwent an open TLIF with a history of preoperative opioid use are significantly more likely to remain on opioids at 6-week follow-up (87% vs 65%, P = .027), 3-month follow-up (63% vs 31%, P = .008), and 6-month follow-up (50% vs 21%, P = .018) compared with MIS TLIF. Conclusion: Patients undergoing MIS TLIF required less inpatient opioids and had a decreased incidence of opioid dependence at 3-month follow-up. Patients with preoperative opioid use undergoing MIS TLIF are less likely to require long-term opioids.
机译:研究设计:在单个机构中对连续患者的回顾性研究目的:检查微创手术(MIS)与开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)手术对长期术后麻醉药消耗的影响。目的:检查微创与开放式TLIF对短期术后麻醉剂消耗的影响。方法:采用适当的统计方法,比较了MIS和开放式TLIF之间的差异,包括住院患者使用阿片类药物和非阿片类药物的镇痛药,出院阿片类药物的使用以及出院后麻醉剂的使用时间。结果:总共172例患者(109例开放; 63例MIS)接受了原发性TLIF。基线特征没有差异。 MIS TLIF队​​列的手术时间(223 vs 251分钟,P = .006)和住院时间(2.7 vs 3.7天,P <.001)显着缩短,估计失血量也更少(184 vs 648 mL,P <.001)。 MIS TLIF的总住院患者阿片类药物使用量(167 vs 255吗啡毫克当量[MME],P = .006)和住院患者羟考酮的使用量(71 vs 105 mg,P = .049)显着减少。开放性TLIF病例需要在3个月的随访中继续使用阿片类药物(36%开放vs. 21%MIS,P = .041)。一项亚组分析发现,接受开放TLIF治疗且有术前使用阿片类药物史的患者在6周的随访中(87%vs 65%,P = .027),3个月的随访结果显示,接受阿片类药物治疗的患者的可能性更大。与MIS TLIF相比,随访(63%比31%,P = 0.008)和6个月随访(50%比21%,P = .018)。结论:接受MIS TLIF的患者在3个月的随访中需要较少的住院阿片类药物,并且阿片类药物依赖的发生率降低。术前使用阿片类药物且接受MIS TLIF的患者较少需要长期使用阿片类药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号