...
首页> 外文期刊>Globalization and Health >Does Pharmaceutical Pricing Transparency Matter? Examining Brazil’s Public Procurement System
【24h】

Does Pharmaceutical Pricing Transparency Matter? Examining Brazil’s Public Procurement System

机译:药品定价透明度重要吗?检查巴西的公共采购系统

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background We review procurement and pricing transparency practices for pharmaceutical products. We specifically focus on Brazil and examine its approach to increasing pricing transparency, with the aim of determining the level of effectiveness in lower prices using a tool (Banco de Pre?os em Saúde, BPS) that only reveals purchase prices as compared to other tools (in other countries) that establish a greater degree of price transparency. Methods A general report of Pre?os em Saúde (BPS) and Sistema Integrado de Administra??o de Servi?os Gerais (SIASG) pricing data was created for 25 drugs that met specific criteria. To explore the linear time trend of each of the drugs, separate regression models were fitted for each drug, resulting in a total of 19 models. Each model controlled for the state variable and the interaction between state and time, in order to accommodate expected heterogeneity in the data. Additionally, the models controlled for procurement quantities and the effect they have on the unit price. Secondary analysis using mixed effects models was also carried out to account for the impact that institutions and suppliers may have upon the unit price. Adjusting for these predictor variables (procurement quantities, supplier, purchasing institution) was important to determine the sole effect that time has had on unit prices. A total of 2 x 19?=?38 models were estimated to explore the overall effect of time on changes in unit price. All statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software, while the linear mixed effects models were fitted using the lme4 R package. Results The findings from our analysis suggest that there is no pattern of consistent price decreases within the two Brazilian states during the five-year period for which the prices were analyzed. Conclusions While the BPS does allow for an increase in transparency and information on drug purchase prices in Brazil, it has not shown to lead to consistent reductions in drug purchase prices for some of the most widely used medicines. This is indicative of a limited model for addressing the challenges in pharmaceutical procurement and puts into question the value of tools used globally to improve transparency in pharmaceutical pricing.
机译:背景我们审查了药品的采购和价格透明度做法。我们特别关注巴西,并研究其提高价格透明度的方法,目的是使用仅能揭示购买价格与其他工具相比的工具(Banco de Pre?os emSaúde,BPS)来确定较低价格的有效性水平。 (在其他国家/地区)则可以提高价格透明度。方法针对25种符合特定标准的药物,创建了Sausde市(BPS)和Sistema Integrado de Servicos Gerais(SIASG)定价数据的一般报告。为了探究每种药物的线性时间趋势,为每种药物拟合了单独的回归模型,从而产生了总共19个模型。每个模型都针对状态变量以及状态与时间之间的交互进行控制,以适应数据中的预期异质性。此外,控制采购数量的模型及其对单价的影响。还使用混合效应模型进行了二次分析,以说明机构和供应商可能对单价产生的影响。调整这些预测变量(采购数量,供应商,采购机构)对于确定时间对单价的唯一影响很重要。估计总共使用了2 x 19?=?38个模型来探讨时间对单价变化的总体影响。所有统计分析均使用R统计软件进行,而线性混合效应模型使用lme4 R软件包进行拟合。结果我们的分析结果表明,在分析价格的五年期间,巴西两个州内没有一致的价格下降模式。结论虽然BPS确实提高了巴西的药品购买价格的透明度和信息,但并未显示出导致某些使用最广泛的药品的药品购买价格持续下降。这表明应对药物采购挑战的模型有限,并质疑全球用于提高药物定价透明度的工具的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号