首页> 外文期刊>IZA Journal of European Labor Studies >Minimum income schemes in Europe: is there a trade-off with activation policies?
【24h】

Minimum income schemes in Europe: is there a trade-off with activation policies?

机译:欧洲最低收入计划:是否需要与激活政策进行权衡?

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract This paper makes two contributions to the literature. First, by employing a macro-level institutional dataset on benefit levels for social assistance (SA) and minimum income protection (MIP) in 22 European countries in the period 1990–2013, I show that the adequacy of income support for low-income inactive individuals in European welfare states has been steadily decreasing since 1994. Second, the paper revisits empirically the hypothesis of a trade-off between the adequacy of out-of-work benefits and the public expenditure on active labor market policies (ALMPs). The empirical results of the fixed effects model show that the trade-off does not appear to be significant in any of the tested specifications. The results are robust to the introduction of a set of conventional controls related to the labor market. JEL Classification: H53, H55, I38.
机译:摘要本文对文献做出了两点贡献。首先,通过在1990年至2013年期间采用22个欧洲国家的社会援助(SA)和最低收入保护(MIP)收益水平的宏观机构数据集,我证明了收入支持对于低收入非活跃人群的充分性自1994年以来,欧洲福利国家中的个人数量一直在稳步下降。其次,本文从经验上重新审视了失业福利的充足性与积极劳动力市场政策(ALMPs)的公共支出之间的折衷假设。固定效应模型的经验结果表明,在任何测试的规范中,权衡似乎都不重要。该结果对于引入一套与劳动力市场有关的常规控制措施是有力的。 JEL分类:H53,H55,I38。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号