...
首页> 外文期刊>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation. >Fixation Versus Replacement in Geriatric Hip Fractures: Does Functional Outcome and Independence in Self-Care Differ?
【24h】

Fixation Versus Replacement in Geriatric Hip Fractures: Does Functional Outcome and Independence in Self-Care Differ?

机译:固定与置换在老年髋部骨折中:自我护理的功能结果和独立性是否不同?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Although there is evidence of improved functional outcomes with our “integrated care pathway” for geriatric hip fractures, we do not know if there is a significant difference in functional recovery of activities of daily living and attainment of independence in self-care between patients who underwent fixation and those treated with arthroplasty.Objective: To determine whether such a difference exists in surgically fixed hip fractures.Materials and Methods: Patients with hip fracture treated surgically were divided into group A (internal fixation, n = 213) and group B (arthroplasty, n = 199). Demographic data, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score, time to surgery, and length of stay were recorded. Inpatient complications and mortality rates were also documented. Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores were recorded for the following intervals: prefall, discharge, 6-month, and at 1-year follow-up.Results: The mean age (A: 80 years and B: 81years), CCI (A: 5.41 and B: 5.43), and length of stay (A: 13.6 days and B: 15.2 days) were not significantly different. However, there was a significant difference (P < .05) in time to surgery (A: 102.2 hours and B: 86.6 hours). Complication rates were about 6% in both groups (A = 6.57%: urinary infections = 13, wound infections = 1 and B = 6.03%: urinary infections = 10, wound infections = 1, pressure ulcer = 1). The preinjury MBI scores were significantly different (P < .05; A: 91.65 and B: 88.19), however, there was no significant difference in scores measured at discharge (A: 60.79 and B: 59.39), 6 months (A: 77.65 and B: 77.47) and 1 year (A: 80.71 and B: 83.03). Patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture had overall recovered 90.9% of their preinjury function (overall MBI at 1 year: 81.83).Conclusion: The MBI scores reflect the extent of attainment of independence in self-care, and actual functional recovery is gauged from the percentage of recovery of preinjury function at 1 year postsurgery. We conclude that the type of surgery may not be a significant factor in determining independence in self-care although patients who had arthroplasty had recovered more function at 1 year postsurgery than those who underwent fixation (percentage recovery of preinjury function—A: 88.1% and B: 94.1%).
机译:简介:尽管有证据表明我们的“老年髋部骨折综合护理途径”改善了功能结局,但我们不知道患者之间的日常生活活动能力恢复和自我护理独立性是否存在显着差异目的:确定手术固定的髋部骨折是否存在这种差异。材料与方法:手术治疗的髋部骨折患者分为A组(内固定,n = 213)和B组。 (置换术,n = 199)。记录人口统计学数据,查尔森合并症指数(CCI)评分,手术时间和住院时间。还记录了住院并发症和死亡率。记录以下时间间隔的改良Barthel指数(MBI)评分:跌倒,出院,6个月和1年随访结果:平均年龄(A:80岁,B:81岁),CCI(A :5.41和B:5.43)和住院时间(A:13.6天和B:15.2天)没有显着差异。但是,手术时间(A:102.2小时和B:86.6小时)有显着差异(P <0.05)。两组的并发症发生率均约为6%(A = 6.57%:尿路感染= 13,伤口感染= 1,B = 6.03%:尿路感染= 10,伤口感染= 1,压疮= 1)。伤前MBI评分有显着差异(P <.05; A:91.65和B:88.19),但是,出院6个月(A:60.79和B:59.39)的评分没有显着差异(A:77.65)和B:77.47)和1年(A:80.71和B:83.03)。接受髋部骨折手术的患者总体恢复了其受伤前功能的90.9%(1年总MBI:81.83)。术后1年损伤前功能恢复的百分比。我们得出的结论是,尽管关节置换术患者术后1年恢复的功能比接受固定术的患者恢复的功能多(损伤前恢复的百分比-A:88.1%,而手术后恢复的百分比),手术类型可能不是决定自我护理独立性的重要因素。 B:94.1%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号