...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >The Effect of Traditional Cupping on Pain and Mechanical Thresholds in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study
【24h】

The Effect of Traditional Cupping on Pain and Mechanical Thresholds in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study

机译:传统拔罐对慢性非特异性颈痛患者疼痛和机械阈值的影响:一项随机对照试验研究

获取原文

摘要

Introduction. Cupping has been used since antiquity in the treatment of pain conditions. In this pilot study, we investigated the effect of traditional cupping therapy on chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNP) and mechanical sensory thresholds.Methods. Fifty CNP patients were randomly assigned to treatment (TG,n=25) or waiting list control group (WL,n=25). TG received a single cupping treatment. Pain at rest (PR), pain related to movement (PM), quality of life (SF-36), Neck Disability Index (NDI), mechanical detection (MDT), vibration detection (MDT), and pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured before and three days after a single cupping treatment. Patients also kept a pain and medication diary (PaDi, MeDi) during the study.Results. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. After cupping TG reported significantly less pain (PR: −17.9 mm VAS, 95%CI −29.2 to −6.6; PM: −19.7, 95%CI −32.2 to −7.2; PaDi: −1.5 points on NRS, 95%CI −2.5 to −0.4; allP<0.05) and higher quality of life than WL (SF-36, Physical Functioning: 7.5, 95%CI 1.4 to 13.5; Bodily Pain: 14.9, 95%CI 4.4 to 25.4; Physical Component Score: 5.0, 95%CI 1.4 to 8.5; allP<0.05). No significant effect was found for NDI, MDT, or VDT, but TG showed significantly higher PPT at pain-areas than WL (in lg(kPa); pain-maximum: 0.088, 95%CI 0.029 to 0.148, pain-adjacent: 0.118, 95%CI 0.038 to 0.199; bothP<0.01).Conclusion. A single application of traditional cupping might be an effective treatment for improving pain, quality of life, and hyperalgesia in CNP.
机译:介绍。自古以来就使用拔罐来治疗疼痛。在这项初步研究中,我们调查了传统拔罐疗法对慢性非特异性颈痛(CNP)和机械感觉阈值的影响。 50名CNP患者被随机分配到治疗组(TG,n = 25)或等待名单对照组(WL,n = 25)。 TG接受了一次拔罐治疗。静止疼痛(PR),与运动有关的疼痛(PM),生活质量(SF-36),颈部残疾指数(NDI),机械检测(MDT),振动检测(MDT)和压力疼痛阈值(PPT)在一次拔罐治疗之前和之后的三天进行测量。在研究期间,患者还保留了疼痛和用药日记(PaDi,MeDi)。两组的基线特征相似。拔罐后TG报告疼痛明显减轻(PR:-17.9mm毫米VAS,95%CI -29.2至-6.6; PM:-19.7,95%CI -32.2至-7.2; PaDi:在NRS上为-1.5分,95%CI- 2.5至-0.4; allP <0.05)和比WL更高的生活质量(SF-36,身体机能:7.5,95%CI 1.4至13.5;身体疼痛:14.9,95%CI 4.4至25.4;物理成分评分:5.0 ,95%CI 1.4至8.5; allP <0.05)。没有发现对NDI,MDT或VDT有显着影响,但TG在疼痛区域的PPT显着高于WL(在lg(kPa)中;最大疼痛:0.088,95%CI 0.029至0.148,相邻疼痛:0.118 95%CI 0.038至0.199;均P <0.01)。一次使用传统拔罐可能是改善CNP疼痛,生活质量和痛觉过敏的有效治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号