首页> 外文期刊>EU agrarian Law >Remedies to Fraud in Documentary Letters of Credit: A Comparative Perspective / Opravné Opatrenia Pri Podvodoch S Dokumentárnymi Akreditívami: Komparatívna Perspektíva
【24h】

Remedies to Fraud in Documentary Letters of Credit: A Comparative Perspective / Opravné Opatrenia Pri Podvodoch S Dokumentárnymi Akreditívami: Komparatívna Perspektíva

机译:信用证跟单的欺诈救济:比较视角:信用证跟单:比较视角

获取原文
       

摘要

Article 4 of the Unified Customs and Practices of Documentary Letters of Credit establishes the notion of autonomy principle by separating credit from underlying contract between account party and beneficiary. Article 5 by recognizing the autonomy principle confirms that effectuate the payment under credit, banks only deal with documents and not with goods. As a result, while documentary letters of credit are meant to facilitate the process of international trade, their sole dependency on compliance of presented documents to bank by beneficiary to actualize the payment will increase the risk of fraud and forgery in the course of their operation. Interestingly, UCP (currently UCP600) takes a silent status regarding the problem of fraud in international LC operation and leaves the ground open for national laws to provide remedies to affected parties by fraudulent beneficiary. National Laws have different approaches to the problem of fraud in general and fraud in international LC operation in particular which makes the access of affected parties to possible remedies complicated and difficult. Current paper tries to find answer to the questions of (i) what available remedies are provided to affected parties in international LC fraud by different legal systems? (ii) And what are conditions for benefiting from such remedies under different legal systems? In achieving its objective, paper will be divided in two main parts to study remedies provided by intentional legal frameworks as well as the ones offered by national laws. Part one will study the position of UCP and UNCITRAL Convention on Independent Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit (UNCITRAL Convention) and remedies, which they provide to LC fraud in international trade. Part two in contrary will study available remedies to LC fraud and condition for access them under English and American legal system.
机译:《跟单信用证统一惯例》第4条确立了自治原则的概念,即将开户方与受益人之间的基础合同中的信用与信用分开。第五条通过承认自治原则,确认了在信用条件下进行付款,银行只处理单据,而不处理货物。结果,虽然跟单信用证旨在促进国际贸易的进程,但它们仅依赖于受益人向银行兑现所提交单据以实现付款,这将增加其操作过程中的欺诈和伪造风险。有趣的是,UCP(当前为UCP600)对国际信用证操作中的欺诈问题保持沉默,并为国家法律为欺诈受益人向受影响的各方提供补救措施提供了条件。对于一般的欺诈问题,尤其是国际信用证操作中的欺诈问题,国家法律有不同的处理方法,这使得受影响的各方难以获得可能的补救措施。当前的论文试图找到以下问题的答案:(i)通过不同的法律体系在国际信用证欺诈中向受影响的当事人提供了哪些可用的补救措施? (ii)在不同的法律制度下,从这些救济中受益的条件是什么?为了实现其目标,论文将分为两个主要部分,以研究故意法律框架提供的补救措施以及国家法律提供的补救措施。第一部分将研究UCP和UNCITRAL独立担保和备用信用证公约(UNCITRAL公约)的立场和补救措施,它们为国际贸易中的LC欺诈提供了补救措施。相反,第二部分将研究针对LC欺诈的可用补救措施以及在英国和美国法律体系下访问LC的条件。

著录项

  • 来源
    《EU agrarian Law》 |2016年第1期|共13页
  • 作者

    Hamed Alavi;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 法律;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 10:28:41
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号