首页> 外文期刊>Eurosurveillance >No evidence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in stool samples of 1,544 asylum seekers arriving in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, April 2016 to March, 2017
【24h】

No evidence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in stool samples of 1,544 asylum seekers arriving in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, April 2016 to March, 2017

机译:2016年4月至2017年3月到达德国莱茵兰-普法尔茨州的1,544名寻求庇护者的粪便样本中没有发现产生碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Since 2015, increased migration from Asia and Africa to Europe has raised public health concerns about potential importation of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE), specifically those producing carbapenemases (C-PE), into European hospitals.Aims: To inform infection control practices about ESBL-PE prevalence in asylum seekers and to investigate whether C-PE prevalence exceeds that in the German population.Methods: Cross-sectional study from April 2016–March 2017. Routinely collected stool samples from asylum seekers were tested for antibiotic resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Country/region of origin and demographic characteristics were explored as risk factors for faecal colonisation.Results: Of 1,544 individuals, 294 tested positive for ESBL-PE colonisation (19.0%; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 17.0–21.0). Asylum seekers originating from Afghanistan/Pakistan/Iran had a prevalence of 29.3% (95% CI: 25.6–33.2), from Syria 20.4% (95% CI: 16.1–25.2) and from Eritrea/Somalia 11.9% (95% CI: 8.7–15.7). CTX-M-15 (79%) and CTX-M-27 (10%) were the most common ESBL determinants. Highest ESBL-PE prevalences were observed in boys under 10 years and women aged 20–39 years (interaction: p?=?0.03). No individuals tested positive for C-PE. Faecal C-PE colonisation prevalence in asylum seekers was not statistically significantly different from prevalence reported in German communities.Conclusion: In absence of other risk factors, being a newly arrived asylum seeker from a region with increased faecal ESBL-PE colonisation prevalence is not an indicator for C-PE colonisation and thus not a reason for pre-emptive screening and isolation upon hospital admission. Keywords: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, ESBL, beta-lactamase CTX-M-27, beta-lactamase CTX-M-15, E. coli ST131, Syria, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Eritrea, Somalia, human migration, mass screening, refugees, drug resistance, microbial, communicable diseases, emerging, epidemiology, infectious disease transmission, prevalence, cross-sectional studies, plasmid mediated fluoroquinolone resistanceIntroductionAntibiotic resistance of pathogens and resulting limitations of therapeutic options increase morbidity, mortality and costs [1]. Since the beginning of this century, the number of infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) has grown rapidly. Of these, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (C-PE) are of particular interest, as carbapenems are considered compounds of last resort against life-threatening infections. Major steps in the spread of antibiotic resistance in Enterobacteriaceae are horizontal exchange of mobile resistance genes into different clones and their dissemination over long distances, often facilitated by travel or migration of the colonised host [2]. International travel to south/south-east Asia and Africa was found to be a risk factor for colonisation [3,4] and subsequent infection with ESBL-PE [5]. Introduction of these bacteria into unaffected hospitals is much dreaded since nosocomial outbreaks of C-PE have been reported world-wide [6].In 2015, Europe was challenged by the arrival of a large number of asylum seekers, sparked primarily by the Syrian civil war, but also by other conflicts and humanitarian crises in southern Asia, western Asia, and Africa. Reports of high ESBL-PE and C-PE colonisation prevalences in hospitalised populations and among asylum seekers from these countries/regions [7-12], together with data on increased ESBL-PE and C-PE colonisation in returning travellers [3,4] led to discussions whether such migration may increase the risk of nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant bacteria in European countries with low C-PE prevalence [13].In April 2016, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) recommended that individuals with recent exposure in high prevalence countries may also be considered for pre-emptive screening and isolation upon admission in European hospitals, even if they had no history of hospitalisation or antibiotic therapy before their arrival in Europe [14]. However, published studies regarding ESBL-PE/C-PE colonisation of migrants seeking asylum in the European Union are limited to research in hospitalised patients [9,10,15,16], do not stratify by country/region of origin [9,10,15,16], and lack statistical power [10,11,15]. Thus, while these studies provide rough estimates of the ESBL-PE/C-PE colonisation prevalence in populations that have a priori an increased likelihood of pre-morbidities, they do not represent newly arrived asylum seekers in general and thus cannot inform whether country/region of origin alone is a sufficient predictor for increased risk of ESBL-PE/C-PE colonisation. Therefore, research on colonisation status in sufficiently large populations recruited outside health care institutions is needed to determine whether newly arrived asylum seekers i
机译:简介:自2015年以来,从亚洲和非洲向欧洲的迁徙增加,引起了公众健康方面的担忧,即可能将产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌科细菌(ESBL-PE)(特别是产生碳青霉烯酶(C-PE)的肠杆菌)输入欧洲医院目的:为寻求庇护者的ESBL-PE患病率提供传染控制方法,并调查C-PE患病率是否超过德国人群。方法:2016年4月至2017年3月的横断面研究。常规收集来自庇护的粪便样本对寻求者进行了抗生素抗性肠杆菌科测试。结果:探讨了原产国/地区和人口特征作为粪便定植的危险因素。结果:在1,544个人中,有294人经检测为ESBL-PE定植阳性(19.0%; 95%置信区间(CI):17.0-21.0)。来自阿富汗/巴基斯坦/伊朗的寻求庇护者的患病率为29.3%(95%CI:25.6-33.2),来自叙利亚的20.4%(95%CI:16.1-25.2)和来自厄立特里亚/索马里的11.9%(95%CI: 8.7–15.7)。 CTX-M-15(79%)和CTX-M-27(10%)是最常见的ESBL决定因素。在10岁以下的男孩和20-39岁的女性中观察到最高的ESBL-PE患病率(相互作用:p = 0.03)。没有人测试C-PE阳性。结论:在没有其他危险因素的情况下,来自粪便中ESBL-PE定殖率升高的地区的新来的寻求庇护者并没有在德国寻求庇护者的粪便C-PE定植流行率与统计学上有显着差异。 C-PE定植的指标,因此不是入院时先行筛查和隔离的原因。关键词:耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科,大肠杆菌,ESBL,β-内酰胺酶CTX-M-27,β-内酰胺酶CTX-M-15,大肠杆菌ST131,叙利亚,阿富汗,伊朗,巴基斯坦,厄立特里亚,索马里,人类迁徙,大规模筛查,难民,耐药性,微生物,传染病,新发疾病,流行病学,传染病传播,患病率,横断面研究,质粒介导的氟喹诺酮耐药性简介病原体的抗生素耐药性以及由此带来的治疗选择局限性增加了发病率,死亡率和成本[1] 。自本世纪初以来,由产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌科细菌(ESBL-PE)引起的感染数量迅速增长。其中,产生碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科(C-PE)特别令人感兴趣,因为碳青霉烯被认为是对抗威胁生命的感染的最后手段。肠杆菌科细菌耐药性传播的主要步骤是将移动抗性基因水平交换到不同的克隆中,并在长距离内传播,这通常是通过定居宿主的旅行或迁移来促进的[2]。发现前往南亚/东南亚和非洲的国际旅行是定植[3,4]和随后感染ESBL-PE的危险因素[5]。自从全世界报道了医院内爆发C-PE以来,将这些细菌引入未受影响的医院就非常令人恐惧[6]。2015年,欧洲受到大量寻求庇护者的到来的挑战,这主要是由叙利亚平民引发的战争,以及南亚,西亚和非洲的其他冲突和人道主义危机。这些国家/地区的住院人群和寻求庇护者中ESBL-PE和C-PE的定殖率很高的报道[7-12],以及回程旅客中ESBL-PE和C-PE的定殖率增加的数据[3,4] ]引发了关于这种迁移是否会增加C-PE患病率较低的欧洲国家中耐多药细菌的医院内传播风险的讨论[13]。2016年4月,欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)建议个人近期在高流行国家中暴露的人也可以考虑在欧洲医院入院时进行先发性筛查和隔离,即使他们在到达欧洲之前没有住院或使用抗生素治疗的历史[14]。但是,已发表的有关在欧盟寻求庇护的移民进行ESBL-PE / C-PE殖民化的研究仅限于住院患者的研究[9,10,15,16],并未按原籍国家/地区进行分层[9, 10,15,16],并且缺乏统计功效[10,11,15]。因此,尽管这些研究提供了先验发病前可能性增加的人群中ESBL-PE / C-PE殖民化流行率的粗略估计,但它们并不代表一般情况下的新来的寻求庇护者,因此无法告知国家/单独的起源区域是增加ESBL-PE / C-PE定植风险的充分预测因子。因此,需要对在卫生保健机构外部招募的足够大的人口进行殖民化研究,以确定是否有新来的寻求庇护者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号