首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical transplantation >A Prospective Randomized, Comparative Trial of High-Dose Mizoribine Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus and Basiliximab for Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Multicenter Trial
【24h】

A Prospective Randomized, Comparative Trial of High-Dose Mizoribine Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus and Basiliximab for Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Multicenter Trial

机译:高剂量米唑啉碱与霉酚酸酯联用他克莫司和巴西立昔单抗联合用于活体供体肾移植的前瞻性随机比较试验:多中心试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives: Our objectives were to compare the clinical outcomes of mizoribine (12 mg/kg/d) and myco-phenolate mofetil (2000 mg/d) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 83 recipients of living-donor renal transplant (performed between 2008 and 2013) in this study. This prospective multi-institutional randomized comparative study compared mizoribine (n = 41) and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 42) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids for living-donor renal transplant recipients. We compared the acute rejection and graft survival rates and adverse event rates within 1 year of renal transplant between the 2 groups using intention-to-treat analyses. Results: During the 1-year observation period, patient and graft survival rates were 100%. The acute rejection rate was 17.1% in the mizoribine group and 19% in the mycophenolate mofetil group. The incidence rate of cytomegalovirus infection seropositivity (recipient and donor with positive cytomegalovirus antibody status) was higher in the mycophenolate mofetil group than in the mizoribine group, although the difference in these rates was not statistically significant. The incidence of leukopenia was higher in the mizoribine group than in the mycophenolate mofetil group. Conclusions: High-dose mizoribine at 12 mg/kg/day was a safe and efficacious immunosuppressive alter-native to mycophenolate mofetil in living-donor renal transplant recipients. Leukopenia should be closely monitored in the initial period of insufficient kidney function after renal transplant.
机译:目的:我们的目的是比较米唑立滨(12 mg / kg / d)和霉酚酸酯(2000 mg / d)联合他克莫司,巴利昔单抗和皮质类固醇的临床疗效。材料和方法:本研究招募了83位活体肾移植患者(2008年至2013年进行)。这项前瞻性的多机构随机比较研究比较了活体肾移植受者的咪唑立滨(n = 41)和霉酚酸酯(n = 42)联合他克莫司,巴利昔单抗和皮质类固醇。我们使用意向性治疗分析比较了两组之间肾移植术后1年内的急性排斥反应和移植物存活率以及不良事件发生率。结果:在1年的观察期内,患者和移植物的存活率为100%。咪唑立滨组的急性排斥率为17.1%,霉酚酸酯的急性排斥率为19%。麦考酚酸酯组的巨细胞病毒感染血清阳性(接受者和供体的巨细胞病毒抗体状态为阳性)的发生率高于米佐列滨组,尽管这些发生率的差异无统计学意义。米佐列滨组的白细胞减少症的发生率高于霉酚酸酯组。结论:在活体供肾的移植受者中,高剂量的咪唑立滨12 mg / kg / day是一种安全有效的霉菌酚酸酯替代免疫抑制剂。在肾移植后肾功能不足的初期应密切监测白细胞减少症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号