...
首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >Editorial – Suboptimal response to intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for patients with diabetic macular edema: is there any point in switching treatment?
【24h】

Editorial – Suboptimal response to intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for patients with diabetic macular edema: is there any point in switching treatment?

机译:社论–糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者对玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗的反应欠佳:转换治疗有什么意义吗?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To investigate if there is any point in switching treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) showing suboptimal response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. The standard of care for DME is anti-VEGF agents. Although anti-VEGF agents seem to be effective for the treatment of DME, there is a proportion of patients, showing a suboptimal response to anti-VEGF treatment. In such patients, switching treatment to another anti-VEGF agent or to intravitreal dexamethasone implant may provide favorable anatomical and functional results. However, without a control group, it is impossible to compare the effect of switching treatment with the effect of continuing the original administered treatment. Switching treatment in patients with DME remains challenging. Further studies with a control group are needed to reach a safe conclusion.
机译:调查在显示对抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗反应欠佳的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者中,转换治疗是否有任何意义。 DME的护理标准是抗VEGF药物。尽管抗VEGF药物似乎对DME有效,但仍有一部分患者对VEGF的治疗反应欠佳。在此类患者中,将治疗改为另一种抗VEGF药物或玻璃体内地塞米松植入物可能会提供良好的解剖和功能结果。但是,如果没有对照组,就无法将转换治疗的效果与继续进行原始治疗的效果进行比较。 DME患者的转换治疗仍然具有挑战性。需要与对照组进行进一步研究才能得出安全的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号