首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry >Influence of Curing Light Attenuation Caused by Aesthetic Indirect Restorative Materials on Resin Cement Polymerization
【24h】

Influence of Curing Light Attenuation Caused by Aesthetic Indirect Restorative Materials on Resin Cement Polymerization

机译:美学间接修复材料引起的固化光衰减对树脂水泥聚合的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives:To verify the effect of interposing different indirect restorative materials on degree of conversion (DC), hardness, and flexural strength of a dual-cure resin cement.Methods:Discs (2 mm-thick, n=5) of four indirect restorative materials were manufactured: a layered glass-ceramic (GC); a heat-pressed lithium disilicate-based glass-ceramic veneered with the layered glass-ceramic (LD); a micro-hybrid (MH); and a micro-filled (MF) indirect composite resin. The light transmittance of these materials was determined using a double-beam spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere. Bar-shaped specimens of a dual-cure resin cement (Nexus 2/SDS Kerr), with (dual-cure mode) and without the catalyst paste (light-cure mode), were photoactivated through the discs using either a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) or a light-emitting diode (LED) unit. As a control, specimens were photoactivated without the interposed discs. Specimens were stored at 37oC for 24h before being submitted to FT-Raman spectrometry (n=3), Knoop microhardness (n=6) and three-point bending (n=6) tests. Data were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey’s test (α=0.05).Results:MH presented the highest transmittance. The DC was lower in light-cure mode than in dual-cure mode. All restorative materials reduced the cement microhardness in light-cure mode. GC and LD with QTH and GC with LED decreased the strength of the cement for both activation modes compared to the controls. Curing units did not affect DC or microhardness, except when the dual-cure cement was photoactivated through LD (LED>QTH). Flexural strength was higher with QTH compared to LED.Conclusions:Differences in transmittance among the restorative materials significantly influenced cement DC and flexural strength, regardless of the activation mode, as well as the microhardness of the resin cement tested in light-cure mode. Microhardness was not impaired by the interposed materials when the resin cement was used in dual-cure mode.
机译:目的:验证插入不同的间接修复材料对双固化树脂胶粘剂的转化度(DC),硬度和抗弯强度的影响。方法:四种间接修复剂的圆片(2毫米厚,n = 5)制造了以下材料:层状玻璃陶瓷(GC);热压的二硅酸锂基玻璃陶瓷贴有层状玻璃陶瓷(LD);微型杂交(MH);微填充(MF)间接复合树脂。使用具有积分球的双光束分光光度计测定这些材料的透光率。使用(钨固化)双固化树脂水泥(Nexus 2 / SDS Kerr)的棒状标本(具有双固化模式)和无催化剂浆(光固化模式)通过圆盘进行光活化。卤素灯(QTH)或发光二极管(LED)单元。作为对照,样品在没有插入光盘的情况下被光活化。在进行FT-拉曼光谱(n = 3),努氏显微硬度(n = 6)和三点弯曲(n = 6)测试之前,将样品在37oC下保存24h。数据通过ANOVA / Tukey检验(α= 0.05)进行分析。结果:MH的透射率最高。在光固化模式下的DC低于在双固化模式下的DC。所有修复材料在光固化模式下都会降低水泥的显微硬度。与对照组相比,带有QTH的GC和LD以及带有LED的GC降低了两种激活模式下水泥的强度。固化单元不影响DC或显微硬度,除非通过LD将双固化水泥光活化(LED> QTH)。结论:在修复材料之间的透射率差异显着影响水泥的直流电和挠曲强度,而与活化模式以及光固化模式下测试的树脂水泥的显微硬度无关。当树脂固化剂在双固化模式下使用时,插入材料不会损害其显微硬度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号