首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Journal of Severe Storms Metereology >Verification and Analysis of Impact-Based Tornado Warnings in the Central Region of the National Weather Service
【24h】

Verification and Analysis of Impact-Based Tornado Warnings in the Central Region of the National Weather Service

机译:国家气象局中部地区基于影响的龙卷风预警的验证和分析

获取原文
       

摘要

The Joplin, Missouri EF5 tornado event on 22 May 2011 prompted the Central Region of the National Weather Service (NWS) to re-evaluate the current tornado warning format and implement the impact-based tornado warning (IBTW) experiment.? IBTWs consist of tiers including damage tags and impact wording that convey increasing levels of damage.? The damage wording within an IBTW is shown to relate to the Enhanced Fujita (EF) scale.? Wording included in non-tagged IBTWs corresponds to EF0-EF2 tornado damage, while the damage wording for tagged IBTWs corresponds to EF3-EF5 tornado damage.? This study investigates the accuracy of IBTWs by examining if a tornado occurs during the warning time frame, and whether the resulting damage matches the damage wording in the IBTW.? All IBTWs from 1 April 2013 through 30 November 2013 were collected, as well as tornado survey information.? Using these survey data, IBTWs were verified by the intensity of the tornado, if one occurred.? Probability of detection (POD) and false alarm ratio (FAR) statistics are calculated through 2×2 contingency tables for both non-tagged and tagged IBTWs.? Results indicate that the majority of both non-tagged and tagged IBTWs are false alarms, and tagged IBTWs have a very low POD.? Other studies have shown that limitations in current technology and scientific knowledge may contribute to false alarms and missed detections.? Case studies are examined to analyze whether these limitations play role in the use of IBTWs.
机译:2011年5月22日,密苏里州乔普林EF5龙卷风事件促使美国国家气象局(NWS)中部地区重新评估当前的龙卷风预警格式,并实施了基于影响的龙卷风预警(IBTW)实验。 IBTW由包括损坏标签和影响措辞的层次组成,这些层次传达了不断增加的损坏程度。 IBTW中的损坏用语显示为与增强藤田(EF)等级有关。未标记的IBTW中包含的措词对应于EF0-EF2龙卷风损坏,而标记的IBTW中包含的损坏措辞对应于EF3-EF5龙卷风损坏。本研究通过检查在警告时间内是否发生龙卷风,以及由此产生的损害是否与IBTW中的损害措辞相匹配,来研究IBTW的准确性。收集了2013年4月1日至2013年11月30日的所有IBTW,以及龙卷风调查信息。使用这些调查数据,如果发生龙卷风的强度,则可以验证IBTW。通过2×2权变表针对未标记和标记的IBTW计算检测概率(POD)和误报率(FAR)统计信息。结果表明,未标记和标记的IBTW大部分都是误报,标记的IBTW的POD极低。其他研究表明,当前技术和科学知识的局限性可能导致误报和漏检。检查案例研究以分析这些限制是否在IBTW的使用中起作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号