...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of General Medicine >An attributive component of the condition of people with the diagnosis of “Ischemic heart disease. Effort angina”
【24h】

An attributive component of the condition of people with the diagnosis of “Ischemic heart disease. Effort angina”

机译:诊断为“缺血性心脏病”的人的状况的一种归因。努力型心绞痛”

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The article is devoted to the study of attributive components of people diagnosed with Ischemic heart disease. Effort angina. The results of empirical studies of the attributive process are discussed in the article. Now more and more researchers, both domestic and foreign, are beginning to consider attribution as one of the principles of human existence. Attributive processes initially began to be developed in line with the cognitive orientation of social psychology. Currently, they are actively considered in the framework of the psychology of social cognition. Method: We conducted a study on 24 subjects with an average cholesterol level of 7.426 mmol / l (concomitant diseases - hypertension, diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome), who underwent treatment in the Central City Clinical Hospital in the rehabilitation department with the diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease. Effort Angina. Initially, we conducted the survey of subjects in order to identify their subjective judgment about the cause of the disease. They were asked a question: “In your opinion, what is the cause of your heart disease?” Results: The results of the survey conducted testify that only a small percentage of the subjects believe that they could exert any influence on their health and, for example, to reduce environmental or biological factors. One would assume that such results may be a specific demonstration of the fact that an individual gains experience that it is precisely human health that is difficult to correct and change and simply does not solve it due to the complexity of the problem. However, data obtained in the course of other experiments and studies [19] show that a person is inclined to explain what is happening by circumstances or situational causes, rather than personal ones. The results obtained with the help of T. Dembo’s cognitive self-assessment technique indicate that women believe that they actually have much less physical exertion and their daily routine is more correct than people who are close to them, in their opinion, think about it. We can assume that introjects are more often peculiar to women than men that are related to housekeeping, which sometimes requires considerable physical activity and time. When a woman has to, at the insistence of a doctor, reduce her physical activity and somehow comply with the daily regimen, she feels discomfort because of which she believes that she “does nothing at all”, although her relatives continue to persuade her to have a rest. Here it is appropriate, in our opinion, to raise the problem of accepting oneself and, as a sequence, to take adequate care of oneself. Significant differences in the self-attributive and reflexive components were also discovered in the emotional sphere of the female subjects. In their opinion, they experience low intensity of negative emotions, such as fear and anger, but at the same time they believe that their close relatives radically disagree. This situation can be explained either by the fact that they assume that they have negative emotions more strongly than they would like (and what they admit to this in the study), or they are judged by the words of relatives who can also make their judgments by interpreting the facts with varying degrees of adequacy. Conclusion: In conclusion, it should be noted that during the analysis we encountered at least two facts that require further empirical research. Firstly, we identified three types of explanations (attributions) in the subjects’ answers: adverbial, subjective and personal, and the latter type of causal attribution is not expressed clearly in the subjects of the study. This poses new questions: does a particular type of situation contribute to this perception, or are there any other factors (including personal ones) playing the role here. Secondly, the following questions arise: how exactly does a subject choose only one alternative from a variety of explanatory reasons. All these questions will be understood as a part of our further research.
机译:目的:本文专门研究被诊断为缺血性心脏病的人的归因成分。努力心绞痛。本文讨论了归因过程的实证研究结果。现在,国内外越来越多的研究人员开始将归因视为人类生存的原则之一。归因过程最初是根据社会心理学的认知取向开始发展的。当前,他们在社会认知心理学的框架内得到积极考虑。方法:我们对24名平均胆固醇水平为7.426 mmol / l(并发疾病-高血压,糖尿病,肥胖,代谢综合征)的受试者进行了研究,这些受试者在中心城市临床医院康复科接受了诊断为缺血性心脏病。努力心绞痛。最初,我们对受试者进行了调查,以确定他们对疾病原因的主观判断。他们被问到一个问题:“您认为心脏病的病因是什么?”结果:进行的调查结果证明,只有一小部分受试者认为他们可以对自己的健康产生任何影响,例如减少环境或生物因素。可以认为,这样的结果可能是一个事实的具体证明,即一个人获得的经验是,正是人类健康难以纠正和改变,并且由于问题的复杂性而无法解决。但是,从其他实验和研究过程中获得的数据[19]表明,一个人倾向于解释由环境或情况原因引起的情况,而不是由个人原因引起的。在T. Dembo的认知自我评估技术的帮助下获得的结果表明,女性认为自己的体育锻炼实际上要少得多,而与自己身边的人相比,她们的日常生活要更正确。我们可以假设,相较于男性,内向性行为是女性特有的,而不是男性,后者有时需要大量的体力活动和时间。当妇女不得不在医生的帮助下减少身体活动并以某种方式遵守日常护理方案时,她会感到不舒服,因此,尽管她的亲戚继续说服她,她仍然认为她“什么也没做”。休息一下。我们认为,在这里适当地提出接纳自己的问题,并适当地照顾自己。在女性受试者的情感领域中,也发现了自我特质和反身成分的显着差异。他们认为,他们的负面情绪(如恐惧和愤怒)的强度较低,但同时他们也认为,其近亲根本不同意。可以通过以下事实来解释这种情况:他们认为自己的负面情绪比他们想要的强烈(以及他们在研究中承认的事实),或者由亲戚的话判断,他们也可以做出判断通过不同程度地解释事实。结论:总之,应该指出的是,在分析过程中,我们至少遇到了两个需要进一步进行实证研究的事实。首先,我们在受试者的答案中确定了三种类型的解释(归因):状语,主观和个人,而后一种因果归因在研究对象中并未明确表达。这就提出了新的问题:一种特殊的情况会导致这种看法,还是有其他因素(包括个人因素)在这里起作用。其次,出现以下问题:主体究竟是如何从各种解释性原因中选择一种选择的呢?所有这些问题将被理解为我们进一步研究的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号