...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology >Parasite control practices and anthelmintic efficacy field study on gastrointestinal nematode infections of Horro sheep in Western Oromiya, Ethiopia
【24h】

Parasite control practices and anthelmintic efficacy field study on gastrointestinal nematode infections of Horro sheep in Western Oromiya, Ethiopia

机译:埃塞俄比亚西部奥罗米亚的恐怖绵羊胃肠道线虫感染的寄生虫控制方法和驱虫效果现场研究

获取原文

摘要

Gastrointestinal nematodes are one of the rampant parasitic diseases constraining sheep farming in western Oromiya. A study aimed at assessing parasite control practices in use and to determine the efficacy of three brands of anthelmintics commonly used on the farms was conducted. Questionnaire survey and faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were used to collect data. Majority of respondents (95.3%) indicated that anthelmintic treatment was the only method used to manage nematode infections in sheep. Many farmers (60.0%) followed prescription orders to determine dosage while others (40.0%) were reliant on visual appraisals. In most responses (38.7%) two treatments were given per year and more deworming can be done directed to animals exhibiting general syndromes such as emaciation, diarrhea and loss of production. Most of the treatments (49.3%) were performed on the farms by the owners. Efficacy tests showed a suspected resistance against albendazole by Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. whereas tetraclozan and ivermectin demonstrated high efficacy against all nematode genera isolated on the farms. Some worm control practices which are thought to enhance selection of resistant strains have been evident. These involved mainly risk of underdosing and continued use of one class of anthelmintics, irrespective of its efficacy status, which may accelerate selection dynamics. To preserve the efficacy of anthelmintics, targeted selective treatments traditionally practiced by farmers should be encouraged and supported by laboratory tests to identify animals in need of treatments. Anthelmintic efficacy evaluations should be part of the control strategies to monitor treatment failures in the study areas.
机译:胃肠道线虫是在奥罗米亚西部限制绵羊饲养的猖para的寄生虫病之一。进行了一项旨在评估所使用的寄生虫控制措施并确定农场常用的三种品牌的驱虫药功效的研究。问卷调查和粪便卵数减少测试(FECRT)用于收集数据。多数受访者(95.3%)表示,驱虫治疗是用于处理绵羊线虫感染的唯一方法。许多农民(60.0%)遵循处方命令确定剂量,而其他农民(40.0%)则依靠视觉评估。在大多数答复中(38.7%),每年进行两次治疗,并且可以对表现出综合症状(例如消瘦,腹泻和生产减少)的动物进行更多的驱虫。大部分处理(49.3%)是由农场主在农场进行的。功效测试显示,疑似弯曲杆菌和毛滴虫对阿苯达唑有抗药性。而四氯生和伊维菌素对农场中分离出的所有线虫属均显示出高疗效。一些蠕虫的控制实践被认为可以增强抗性菌株的选择。这些主要涉及剂量不足和继续使用一类驱虫药的风险,而不论其疗效状态如何,这可能会加速选择动态。为了保持驱虫药的功效,应该鼓励农民传统上实行有针对性的选择性治疗,并应通过实验室检测来支持,以鉴定需要治疗的动物。驱虫药效果评估应成为监控研究区域治疗失败的控制策略的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号