首页> 外文期刊>Eurasian Journal of Soil Science >Comparison of kriging interpolation precision between grid sampling scheme and simple random sampling scheme for precision agriculture
【24h】

Comparison of kriging interpolation precision between grid sampling scheme and simple random sampling scheme for precision agriculture

机译:网格农业抽样方案与简单随机抽样方案的克里格插值精度比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Sampling methods are important factors that can potentially limit the accuracy of predictions of spatial distribution patterns. A 10 ha tobacco - planted field was selected to compared the accuracy in predicting the spatial distribution of soil properties by using ordinary kriging and cross valid ation methods between grid sampling and simple random sampling scheme (SRS). To achieve this objective, we collected soil samples from the topsoil (0 - 20 cm) in March 2012. Sample numbers of grid sampling and SRS were both 115 points each. Accuracies of spa tial interpolation using the two sampling schemes were then evaluated based on validation samples (36 points) and deviations of the estimates. The results suggested that soil pH and nitrate - N (NO 3 - N) had low variation, whereas all other soil properties exh ibited medium variation. Soil pH, organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), cation exchange capacity (CEC), total phosphorus (TP) and available phosphorus (AP) matched the spherical model, whereas the remaining variables fit an exponential model with both sampling methods. The interpolation error of soil pH, TP, and AP was the lowest in SRS. The errors of interpolation for OM, CEC, TN, available potassium (AK) and total potassium (TK) were the lowest for grid sampling. The interpolation precisions of the so il NO 3 - N showed no significant differences between the two sampling schemes. Considering our data on interpolation precision and the importance of minerals for cultivation of flue - cured tobacco, the grid - sampling scheme should be used in tobacco - planted fi elds to determine the spatial distribution of soil properties. The grid - sampling method can be applied in a practical and cost - effective manner to facilitate soil sampling in tobacco - planted field.
机译:采样方法是重要的因素,可能会限制空间分布模式的预测准确性。选择了一个10公顷的烟草种植田,通过使用网格采样和简单随机采样方案(SRS)之间的普通克里格法和交叉验证方法,比较了预测土壤特性空间分布的准确性。为了实现这一目标,我们于2012年3月从表土(0-20 cm)收集了土壤样品。网格采样和SRS的采样数均为115点。然后根据验证样本(36个点)和估计值的偏差,评估使用两种采样方案的空间插值的准确性。结果表明,土壤pH和硝酸盐-N(NO 3 -N)的变化较小,而所有其他土壤特性均表现出中等的变化。土壤pH,有机质(OM),总氮(TN),阳离子交换容量(CEC),总磷(TP)和有效磷(AP)均与球形模型匹配,而其余变量与两种采样方法均符合指数模型。土壤pH,TP和AP的插值误差在SRS中最低。网格采样的OM,CEC,TN,有效钾(AK)和总钾(TK)的内插误差最低。样品NO 3-N的内插精度在两种采样方案之间没有显着差异。考虑到我们关于插值精度的数据以及矿物对烤烟种植的重要性,应在烟叶种植领域中采用网格采样方案来确定土壤特性的空间分布。可以以实用且经济高效的方式应用网格采样方法,以促进烟草种植田间的土壤采样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号