首页> 外文期刊>Ethiopian journal of health sciences >An Evidence-Based Framework for Evidence-Based Management in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi Study
【24h】

An Evidence-Based Framework for Evidence-Based Management in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi Study

机译:医疗组织中基于证据的管理的基于证据的框架:Delphi研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Evidence-based management (EBMgt) is a growing literature concept in management sciences which claims that management decision-making must be based on the best available evidence. The aim of this paper is to present and provide an evidence-based framework for EBMgt to improve decision-making in healthcare organizations. Methods A two-round Delphi survey was used to collect the factors affecting EBMgt. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used in both rounds. In round 1, we conducted a systematic review and a series of semi-structured interviews (n=45). In round 2, a specific questionnaire with four main parts was designed. The experts (n=21) were asked to rate on a 9-point Likert scale the importance of each factor. The data was collected through Google Forms (n=11) and paper forms (n=10). Results Participants were mostly men (73%). Overall, 126 factors were selected in round 1. Factors were classified into 4 categories: facilitators, barriers, the sources of evidence and EBMgt process that consisted of 48, 46, 22 and 10 factors, respectively. In round 2, based on median scores, many factors (n=114) were found to be very important. Only, 12 factors have a median score of less than 3 and were excluded from the study. Finally, 114 factors were confirmed. Conclusions Confirmed factors played significant roles in affecting the practice of EBMgt among healthcare managers. We tried to facilitate interaction between these factors in the framework. Depending on the type of problem, using six steps of EBMgt process, managers will select the best evidence among six sources of evidence.
机译:背景技术循证管理(EBMgt)是管理科学中一个不断发展的文献概念,声称管理决策必须基于最佳的现有证据。本文的目的是为EBMgt提出并提供基于证据的框架,以改善医疗保健组织的决策。方法采用两轮Delphi调查收集影响EBMgt的因素。在两轮比赛中均采用了目的性和滚雪球式采样方法。在第一轮中,我们进行了系统的审查和一系列半结构化访谈(n = 45)。在第二轮中,设计了包含四个主要部分的特定问卷。要求专家(n = 21)在9点李克特量表上对每个因素的重要性进行评分。数据是通过Google表单(n = 11)和纸质表单(n = 10)收集的。结果参与者多为男性(73%)。总体而言,在第1轮中选择了126个因素。因素分为4类:促进者,障碍,证据来源和EBMgt过程,分别由48、46、22和10个因素组成。在第二轮中,根据中位数得分,发现许多因素(n = 114)非常重要。只有12个因素的中位数得分小于3,并且被排除在研究之外。最后,确定了114个因素。结论在医疗保健管理者中,已证实的因素在影响EBMgt的实践中起着重要作用。我们试图促进框架中这些因素之间的相互作用。根据问题的类型,管理人员将使用EBMgt流程的六个步骤,从六个证据来源中选择最佳证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号