首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source >Source reduction for prevention of methylene chloride hazards: cases from four industrial sectors
【24h】

Source reduction for prevention of methylene chloride hazards: cases from four industrial sectors

机译:减少源头以预防二氯甲烷危害:来自四个工业部门的案例

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Source reduction, defined as chemical, equipment and process changes that intervene in an industrial process to eliminate or reduce hazards, has not figured as a front-line strategy for the protection of workers' health. Such initiatives are popular for environmental protection, but their feasibility and effectiveness as an industrial hygiene approach have not been well described. Methods We investigated four cases of source reduction as a hazard prevention strategy in Massachusetts companies that had used methylene chloride, an occupational carcinogen, for cleaning and adhesive thinning. Three cases were retrospective and one was prospective, where the researchers assisted with the source reduction process change. Data were collected using qualitative research methods, including in-depth interviews and site visits. Results Motivated by environmental restrictions, a new worker health standard, and opportunity for productivity improvements, three companies eliminated their use of methylene chloride by utilizing available technologies and drop-in substitutes. Aided by technical assistance from the investigators, a fourth case dramatically reduced its use of methylene chloride via process and chemistry changes. While the companies' evaluations of potential work environment impacts of substitutes were not extensive, and in two cases new potential hazards were introduced, the overall impact of the source reduction strategy was deemed beneficial, both from a worker health and a production standpoint. Conclusion The findings from these four cases suggest that source reduction should be considered potentially feasible and effective for reducing or eliminating the potential hazards of methylene chloride exposure. Especially when faced with a hazard that is both an environmental and worker health concern, companies may chose to change their processes rather than rely on local exhaust ventilation equipment or personal protective equipment that might not be as effective, might transfer risk and/or not be integrated with financial goals. However, technical assistance sensitive to environmental and health and safety impacts as well as production issues should be provided to guide companies' source reduction efforts.
机译:背景技术减少源头(定义为干预工业过程中的化学,设备和过程变化以消除或减少危害)尚未被视为保护工人健康的一线战略。这种举措在环境保护方面很受欢迎,但是作为工业卫生方法的可行性和有效性尚未得到很好的描述。方法我们调查了马萨诸塞州公司的四种减少源的情况,这是一种预防危害的策略,这些公司使用了职业致癌物二氯甲烷进行清洁和稀释粘合剂。 3例为回顾性病例,1例为前瞻性病例,研究人员在其中协助减少了源头过程。使用定性研究方法收集数据,包括深度访谈和实地考察。结果受环境限制,新的工人健康标准以及提高生产率的机会的激励,三家公司通过利用可用的技术和直接替代品消除了对二氯甲烷的使用。在研究人员的技术协助下,第四起案件通过工艺和化学变化大幅减少了二氯甲烷的使用。尽管公司对替代品的潜在工作环境影响的评估并不广泛,并且在两种情况下引入了新的潜在危害,但从工人健康和生产的角度来看,减少污染源策略的总体影响被认为是有益的。结论从这四个案例中得出的结论表明,应考虑减少源头,以减少或消除二氯甲烷暴露的潜在危害。尤其是当面临既危害环境又危害员工健康的危害时,公司可能会选择更改其流程,而不是依靠可能效果不佳,可能转移风险和/或不可行的本地排气通风设备或个人防护设备与财务目标整合在一起。但是,应提供对环境,健康和安全影响以及生产问题敏感的技术援助,以指导公司减少污染源的努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号