首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Economics >Selection of Market Demand Forecast Methods: Criteria and Application
【24h】

Selection of Market Demand Forecast Methods: Criteria and Application

机译:市场需求预测方法的选择:标准与应用

获取原文
       

摘要

The article deals with the theoretical aspects of the market demand method selection criteria and their application in practice. As the definition of market demand and conditions is related to the achievement of important general strategic decisions and consumers’ behaviour on the competitive market, the accurate identification of the market demand method selection criteria and their application can reduce decision indefiniteness. Hence, the main aim of the article is to analyse market demand forecast method selection criteria, and apply them in developing Lithuanian furniture demand forecast. The theoretical part of the article starts with the analysis of the forecast method reasoning and forecast method classification under various economic literature criteria. The analysis of the main forecast method groups disclosed that it was rather difficult to determine the advantage of any method in forecast estimation, whereas, always the risk of the wrong method selection remained. It was determined that usually unanimous authors’ opinion on the complex application of quantitative and qualitative forecast methods differed in two aspects: one group of researchers supported the priority of quantitative forecast methods by using qualitative forecast methods as an auxiliary or alternative means, while the other group of authors stated that equal application of both types of forecast methods guaranteed higher reliability and carried more information. Quite often any market demand forecast encounters the relevant forecast method selection problem. It should be noted that there are advantages and disadvantages of the forecast method selection in every case; therefore, the analysis and differentiation of the main forecast method selection criteria is expedient. The selection of the forecast method should be based on several criteria taking into account the applicability of the forecast method complexity, i.e., forecast accuracy level, period of time, the scope of initial data, forecast costs, and the level of result appropriateness and applicability. The article deals with the research related to the selection of the forecast method for the Lithuanian furniture industry to define the furniture demand forecast for 2007. The object of research is furniture sales on the national market that reflect the solvent part of the furniture demand. The comparison of the forecast accuracy assessment indicators that were estimated by using different forecast methods indicate that the lowest furniture sales forecast error values were achieved by applying exponential smoothing method where &=0.3: forecast error value (et = 77.19) demonstrated the smallest difference between furniture sales forecast and fact, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE = 8.29 proc.) indicated high forecast accuracy, and mean percentage error (MPE = 8.29 proc.) described small positive forecast deviation. In order to achieve the qualitative forecast assessment, forecast reliability intervals were calculated where criterion z = 1.960. The results allow to assume that furniture sales forecast for 2008 with 95 per cent probability can vary from LTL, 844.64 mio. to LTL, 1147.20 mio.
机译:本文讨论了市场需求方法选择标准的理论方面及其在实践中的应用。由于市场需求和条件的定义与重要的总体战略决策的实现和消费者在竞争性市场上的行为有关,因此准确确定市场需求方法选择标准及其应用可以减少决策的不确定性。因此,本文的主要目的是分析市场需求预测方法的选择标准,并将其应用于立陶宛家具需求预测的制定中。本文的理论部分从分析各种经济文献标准下的预测方法推理和预测方法分类开始。对主要预测方法组的分析显示,要确定任何方法在预测估计中的优势都是相当困难的,而始终存在错误选择方法的风险。已确定,通常一致的作者对定量和定性预测方法的复杂应用的观点在两个方面有所不同:一组研究人员通过将定性预测方法用作辅助或替代手段来支持定量预测方法的优先级,而另一组研究人员则支持定量预测方法的优先级。一组作者指出,两种预测方法的均等应用可确保更高的可靠性并承载更多信息。任何市场需求预测通常都会遇到相关的预测方法选择问题。应该注意的是,每种情况下选择预测方法都有其优点和缺点。因此,主要预测方法选择标准的分析和区分是方便的。预测方法的选择应基于几种标准,并考虑到预测方法复杂性的适用性,即预测准确性级别,时间段,初始数据范围,预测成本以及结果适用性和适用性级别。本文涉及与选择立陶宛家具行业的预测方法有关的研究,以定义2007年家具需求预测。研究的目的是反映在全国市场上家具需求的溶剂部分的家具销售。通过使用不同的预测方法估算的预测准确性评估指标的比较表明,通过应用指数平滑方法获得了最低的家具销售预测误差值,其中&= 0.3:预测误差值(et = 77.19)表明两者之间的最小差异家具销售预测和事实,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE = 8.29 proc。)表明预测准确性高,平均百分比误差(MPE = 8.29 proc。)描述了较小的正预测偏差。为了实现定性的预测评估,在标准z = 1.960的情况下计算了预测的可靠性区间。结果可以假设,以95%的概率预测的2008年家具销售额可能与844.64 mio的零担价格有所不同。零担1147.20 mio。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号