首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Research Letters >Accounting for soil carbon sequestration in national inventories: a soil scientist’s perspective
【24h】

Accounting for soil carbon sequestration in national inventories: a soil scientist’s perspective

机译:考虑国家清单中的土壤碳固存:土壤科学家的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

As nations debate whether and how best to include the agricultural sector in greenhouse gas pollution reduction schemes, the role of soil organic carbon as a potential large carbon sink has been thrust onto center stage. Results from most agricultural field trials indicate a relative increase in soil carbon stocks with the adoption of various improved management practices. However, the few available studies with time series data suggest that this relative gain is often due to a reduction or cessation of soil carbon losses rather than an actual increase in stocks. On the basis of this observation, we argue here that stock change data from agricultural field trials may have limited predictive power when the state of the soil carbon system is unknown and that current IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) accounting methodologies developed from the trial results may not properly credit these management activities. In particular, the use of response ratios is inconsistent with the current scientific understanding of carbon cycling in soils and response ratios will overestimate the net–net sequestration of soil carbon if the baseline is not at steady state.
机译:随着各国对是否以及如何最好地将农业部门纳入减少温室气体污染的计划进行辩论,土壤有机碳作为潜在的大型碳汇的作用已被置于中心位置。大多数农业田间试验的结果表明,采用各种改进的管理方法后,土壤碳储量相对增加。但是,鲜有时间序列数据的可用研究表明,这种相对增加通常是由于土壤碳损失的减少或停止而不是种群的实际增加。基于此观察,我们在这里认为,当土壤碳系统的状态未知时,来自农田试验的种群变化数据可能具有有限的预测能力,并且该试验开发了当前的IPCC(政府间气候变化专门委员会)会计方法结果可能无法正确归功于这些管理活动。特别是,响应比率的使用与当前对土壤中碳循环的科学理解不一致,并且如果基线不处于稳定状态,响应比率将高估土壤碳的净-净固存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号