...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Technology and Applied Science Research >Evaluation of Three Common Algorithms for Structure Active Control
【24h】

Evaluation of Three Common Algorithms for Structure Active Control

机译:三种常见的结构主动控制算法评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recently active structure controllers were considered to deal with the impact of earthquake forces and the result of the investigations provided multiple algorithms to calculate force control and many different ways to apply these forces on the structure. In this study, the efficiency and effectiveness of three methods (linear quadratic regulator, fuzzy logic and pole assigning) are investigated. In addition, three buildings with different height classes with an active tuned mass damper (ATMD) on the top floor are considered to compare the active control methods. Examples with known mass and stiffness and with variable mass are considered. The results show that all three control methods used for the ATMD device reduce the structural response. The fuzzy control method, caused a sharp decline in relative displacement of building floors up to 80%. But in LQR and pole allocation procedures the applied force is limited. The best performance of fuzzy control is for high-rise buildings. The three different methods of control are stable in different masses and even under a random change of floor masses, their effectiveness can be trusted.
机译:最近考虑使用主动结构控制器来应对地震力的影响,研究结果提供了多种算法来计算力控制,以及将这些力施加到结构上的许多不同方式。在这项研究中,研究了三种方法(线性二次调节器,模糊逻辑和极点分配)的效率和有效性。另外,考虑了三个不同高度等级的建筑物,其顶层设有主动调谐质量阻尼器(ATMD),以比较主动控制方法。考虑具有已知质量和刚度以及具有可变质量的示例。结果表明,用于ATMD装置的所有三种控制方法均会降低结构响应。模糊控制方法使建筑物地板的相对位移急剧下降,下降幅度高达80%。但是在LQR和极点分配程序中,施加的力是有限的。模糊控制的最佳性能是用于高层建筑。三种不同的控制方法在不同质量下都是稳定的,即使在地板质量发生随机变化的情况下,其有效性也值得信赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号