首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Research Letters >Who benefits from environmental policy? An environmental justice analysis of air quality change in Britain, 2001–2011
【24h】

Who benefits from environmental policy? An environmental justice analysis of air quality change in Britain, 2001–2011

机译:谁从环境政策中受益? 2001-2011年英国空气质量变化的环境正义分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Air quality in Great Britain has improved in recent years, but not enough to prevent the European Commission (EC) taking legal action for non-compliance with limit values. Air quality is a national public health concern, with disease burden associated with current air quality estimated at 29 000 premature deaths per year due to fine particulates, with a further burden due to NO2. National small-area analyses showed that in 2001 poor air quality was much more prevalent in socio-economically deprived areas. We extend this social distribution of air quality analysis to consider how the distribution changed over the following decade (2001–2011), a period when significant efforts to meet EC air quality directive limits have been made, and air quality has improved. We find air quality improvement is greatest in the least deprived areas, whilst the most deprived areas bear a disproportionate and rising share of declining air quality including non-compliance with air quality standards. We discuss the implications for health inequalities, progress towards environmental justice, and compatibility of social justice and environmental sustainability objectives.
机译:近年来,英国的空气质量有所改善,但不足以阻止欧洲委员会(EC)对违反限值的行为采取法律行动。空气质量是国家对公共健康的关注,与当前空气质量有关的疾病负担估计是每年由于细颗粒物导致29 000人过早死亡,而由于NO2造成的进一步负担。全国小面积分析表明,2001年,在社会经济贫困的地区,空气质量差的情况更加普遍。我们扩展了空气质量分析的这种社会分布,以考虑分布在接下来的十年(2001-2011年)中如何变化,在此期间,人们做出了巨大努力来满足EC空气质量指令的限制,并且空气质量得到了改善。我们发现,在最贫困的地区,空气质量的改善最大,而最贫困的地区在空气质量下降(包括不符合空气质量标准)中所占的比例却越来越高。我们讨论了对健康不平等,环境正义的进步以及社会正义与环境可持续性目标的兼容性的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号