...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >Endoscopic submucosal dissection in management of colorectal tumors near or involving a diverticulum: a retrospective case series
【24h】

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in management of colorectal tumors near or involving a diverticulum: a retrospective case series

机译:内镜下黏膜下剥离治疗附近或累及憩室的大肠肿瘤:回顾性病例系列

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and study aims Surgery is the standard treatment for colon tumors associated with diverticulum. U se of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to treat such tumors is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of ESD in treating superficial colorectal tumors situated near or involving diverticulum. Patients and methods Consecutive patients from two referral centers who had colorectal tumors near or involving diverticulum treated by ESD were retrospectively studied. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results Of the 12 patients studied, six had tumors near diverticulum and six had tumors involving diverticulum. The overall en-bloc R0 resection rate, median tumor size and procedure time were 67?%, 26.5?mm (range, 15?–?80?mm) and 110 minutes (range, 50?–?220 minutes), respectively. For tumors near diverticulum group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was 100?% and no adverse events (AEs) or residual/recurrent tumors were observed. In contrast, for intradiverticular tumors group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was low at 33?%, and one AE (perforation) was observed. The diverticula were ≥?6?mm in diameter in the patients with incomplete resection. However, all but one diverticulum was unrecognized before ESD. Two residual tumors were detected at the 12-month surveillance and one required surgery. Conclusions This case series indicates that ESD is safe and feasible for treating colorectal tumors near a diverticulum and might be feasible for tumors involving a diverticulum smaller than 6?mm. Selection for smaller diverticulum size may contribute to higher en-bloc R0 resection rates.
机译:背景和研究目的手术是与憩室相关的结肠肿瘤的标准治疗方法。内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)用于治疗此类肿瘤的方法存在争议。这项研究的目的是评估ESD治疗靠近憩室或累及憩室的浅表性大肠肿瘤的安全性和可行性。患者和方法回顾性研究了来自两个转诊中心的连续患者,这些患者的大肠肿瘤均在接受ESD治疗的憩室附近或涉及憩室。分析了临床病理特征和临床结局。结果研究的12例患者中,有6例在憩室附近有肿瘤,有6例涉及憩室。总体R0切除率,中位肿瘤大小和手术时间分别为67%,26.5mm(范围为15mm至80mm)和110分钟(范围为50min至220分钟)。对于憩室附近的肿瘤,R0整体切除率为100%,未观察到不良事件(AE)或残留/复发的肿瘤。相反,对于憩室内肿瘤组,大块R0切除率低至33%,并且观察到1枚AE(穿孔)。不完全切除患者的憩室直径≥6?mm。但是,除一个憩室外,所有其他憩室在ESD之前均未被识别。在12个月的监测中发现了两个残留的肿瘤,其中一个需要进行手术。结论该病例系列表明ESD治疗憩室附近的大肠肿瘤是安全可行的,对于憩室小于6?mm的肿瘤可能是可行的。选择较小的憩室可能有助于提高整体R0切除率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号