...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >Endoscopic ablation is a cost-effective cancer preventative therapy in patients with Barrett’s esophagus who have elevated genomic instability
【24h】

Endoscopic ablation is a cost-effective cancer preventative therapy in patients with Barrett’s esophagus who have elevated genomic instability

机译:内窥镜消融是对基因组不稳定性升高的Barrett食管患者的一种经济有效的癌症预防疗法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The surveillance of patients with nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (NDBE) has a high cost and is of limited effectiveness in preventing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Ablation for NDBE remains expensive and controversial. Biomarkers of genomic instability have shown promise in identifying patients with NDBE at high risk for progression to EAC. Here, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using such biomarkers to stratify patients with NDBE by risk for EAC and, subsequently, the cost-effectiveness of ablative therapy. Methods: A Markov decision tree was used to evaluate four strategies in a hypothetical cohort of 50-year old patients with NDBE over their lifetime: strategy I, natural history without surveillance; strategy II, surveillance per current guidelines; strategy III, ablation for all patients; strategy IV, risk stratification with use of a biomarker panel to assess genomic instability (i.?e., mutational load [ML]). Patients with no ML underwent minimal surveillance, patients with low ML underwent standard surveillance, and patients with high ML underwent ablation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net health benefit (INHB) were assessed. Results: Strategy IV provided the best values for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), ICER, and INHB in comparison with strategies II and III. Results were robust in sensitivity analysis. In a Monte Carlo analysis, the relative risk for the development of cancer in the patients managed with strategy IV was decreased. Critical determinants of strategy IV cost-effectiveness were the complete response rate, cost of ablation, and surveillance interval in patients with no ML. Conclusion: The use of ML to stratify patients with NDBE by risk was the most cost-effective strategy for preventive EAC treatment. Targeting ablation toward patients with high ML presents an opportunity for a paradigm shift in the management of NDBE.
机译:背景:对非典型增生性Barrett食道(NDBE)病人的监视费用高昂,并且在预防食道腺癌(EAC)方面效果有限。 NDBE的消融仍然昂贵且有争议。基因组不稳定性的生物标志物已显示出在发展为EAC高危人群中鉴定NDBE患者的希望。在这里,我们通过EAC风险评估使用此类生物标记物对NDBE患者进行分层的成本效益,然后评估消融治疗的成本效益。方法:使用马尔科夫决策树评估假设的队列中50岁的NDBE患者在其一生中的四种策略:策略I,无监测的自然病史;策略二,根据当前指南进行监控;策略三,对所有患者进行消融;策略四,使用生物标志物组评估基因组不稳定性(即突变负荷[ML])进行风险分层。无ML的患者接受最低限度的监测,低ML的患者接受标准监测,高ML的患者接受消融。评估了增量成本效益比(ICER)和增量健康净收益(INHB)。结果:与策略II和III相比,策略IV为质量调整生命年(QALYs),ICER和INHB提供了最佳价值。敏感性分析结果稳定。在蒙特卡洛分析中,采用策略IV治疗的患者发生癌症的相对风险降低了。对于没有ML的患者,策略IV成本效益的关键决定因素是完全缓解率,消融成本和监测间隔。结论:使用ML按风险对NDBE患者进行分层是预防性EAC治疗的最具成本效益的策略。针对高ML患者的消融为NDBE管理模式的转变提供了机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号