...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >Comparison of rectal suction versus rectal tube insertion for reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after unsedated colonoscopy
【24h】

Comparison of rectal suction versus rectal tube insertion for reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after unsedated colonoscopy

机译:比较未镇静的结肠镜检查后立即进行直肠吸引和直肠管插入以减轻腹部症状的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and study aims: Abdominal discomfort and bloating are common symptoms after colonoscopy. We aimed to compare the effects of direct rectal suction with insertion of a rectal tube on reducing abdominal symptoms after unsedated colonoscopy. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to have direct rectal suction or placement of a rectal tube immediately after colonoscopy. Post-procedure abdominal pain and bloating were measured with a 0?–?100 visual analogue scale. All participants ranked their satisfaction with either direct rectal suction or insertion of a rectal tube. Results: Abdominal pain and bloating were significantly reduced by direct rectal suction and placement of a rectal tube at 1 minute (both P?
机译:背景和研究目的:腹部不适和腹胀是结肠镜检查后的常见症状。我们的目的是比较未经镇静的结肠镜检查后直接直肠吸引与插入直肠管对减轻腹部症状的影响。患者和方法:连续接受结肠镜检查的患者被随机分配为在结肠镜检查后立即进行直肠直接抽吸或放置直肠管。手术后腹痛和腹胀用0?–?100视觉模拟量表测量。所有参与者均对直接直肠吸引或直肠管插入感到满意。结果:在结肠镜检查后第1分钟(均P 0.05)和第3分钟(均P 0.05),直接直肠吸引和放置直肠管显着减少了腹痛和腹胀。与直肠管插入相比,直接直肠吸引在结肠镜检查后1分钟(P <= 0.001)和3分钟(P = 0.005)时显着减轻了腹痛。与在结肠镜检查后1分钟插入直肠管的患者相比,直接直肠吸引的患者的腹胀明显更低(P≥0.03)。与直接插入直肠管的患者相比,直接直肠吸引的患者满意度更高(P≥0.009)。结论:在直肠镜检查后,直接直肠吸引比直肠导管置入对减轻腹部症状更有效。我们的研究表明,当患者难以排空空气或在结肠镜检查后出现腹部症状时,直接直肠抽吸有助于缓解症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号