...
首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Physician >Comparison of the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel and dentin with different protocol of application
【24h】

Comparison of the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel and dentin with different protocol of application

机译:不同应用方案对自粘树脂胶粘剂与牙釉质和牙本质的剪切粘结强度的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim The aim of the present study was to determine the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel and dentin with and without surface treatments, and compare them with conventional resin cement as the control group. Methods In this experimental study, buccal and lingual surface of the thirty sound human premolars were polished in order to obtain a flat surface of enamel (E) in buccal, and dentin (D) in lingual. Sixty feldspathic ceramic blocks (2×3×3 mm) were prepared and randomly divided into six groups (n=10). Each block was cemented to the prepared surface (30 enamel and 30 dentin surface) according to different protocol: E1 and D1; RelyX ARC as control group, E2, D2; RelyX Unicem, E3, D3; acid etching +RelyX Unicem. The specimens were termocycled and subjected to shear forces by a universal testing machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. The mode of fracture were evaluated by stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistical methods using SPSS version 15. One-way ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests were used to compare bond strengths between the groups with different adhesives at α=0.05. Results Statistical analysis showed no significant differences within the enamel subgroups, but there were significant differences within the dentinal subgroups, and statistically significant differences were found between the groups D1and D3 (p=0.02). Comparison between similar enamel and dentinal subgroups showed that there was a significant difference just between the subgroups E3 and D3 (p=0.01). Conclusion Elective etching of enamel did not lead to significant increase in the shear bond strength of RelyX Unicem in comparison to RelyX ARC. On the other hand, elective etching of dentin reduces the bond strength of RelyX Unicem with the dentin.
机译:目的本研究的目的是确定经过表面处理和不经过表面处理的自粘树脂胶粘剂对牙釉质和牙本质的剪切粘结强度,并将它们与常规树脂胶粘剂作为对照组进行比较。方法在本实验研究中,对30个声音正常的人前磨牙的颊和舌表面进行抛光,以在颊上获得牙釉质(E)和在舌上获得牙本质(D)的平坦表面。制备了60个长石质陶瓷块(2×3×3 mm),并随机分为六组(n = 10)。根据不同的方案:E1和D1;将每个块粘结到准备好的表面(30个牙釉质和30个牙本质表面)上。 RelyX ARC作为对照组,E2,D2; RelyX Unicem,E3,D3;酸蚀刻+ RelyX Unicem。将样品进行热循环,并通过万能试验机以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度承受剪切力。用立体显微镜评价骨折的方式。使用描述性统计方法,使用SPSS 15版对数据进行分析。单向方差分析和事后Tukey测试用于比较α= 0.05下使用不同粘合剂的组之间的粘合强度。结果统计分析表明牙釉质亚组之间无显着差异,但牙本质亚组之间无显着差异,D1和D3组之间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。比较相似的牙釉质和牙本质亚组,发现E3和D3亚组之间存在显着差异(p = 0.01)。结论与RelyX ARC相比,对搪瓷进行电刻蚀不会导致RelyX Unicem的剪切粘结强度显着提高。另一方面,对牙本质的选择性蚀刻会降低RelyX Unicem与牙本质的结合强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号