...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens
【24h】

Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens

机译:胰腺内镜超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学标本的细胞病理学家间观察员之间的共识

获取原文

摘要

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed to evaluate IOA among cytopathologists in assessing EUS-FNA cytology specimens of solid pancreatic lesions using a novel standardized scoring system and to assess individual clinical and cytologic predictors of IOA. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary care referral center were included. EUS-FNA slides were evaluated by four blinded cytopathologists using a standardized scoring system that assessed final cytologic diagnosis and quantitative (number of nucleated/diagnostic cells) and qualitative (bloodiness, inflammationecrosis, contamination, artifact) cytologic parameters. Final clinical diagnosis was based on final cytology, surgical pathology, or 1-year clinical follow-up.?IOA was calculated using multi-rater kappa (κ) statistics. Bivariate analyses were performed comparing cases with and without uniform agreement among the cytopathologists followed by logistic regression with backward elimination to model likelihood of uniform agreement. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included (49?% males, mean age 64 years, mean lesion size 26?mm). IOA for final diagnosis was moderate (κ?=?0.45, 95?% confidence interval (CI) 0.4?–?0.49) with minimal improvement when combining suspicious and malignant diagnoses (κ?=?0.54, 95?%CI 0.49?–?0.6). The weighted kappa value for overall diagnosis was 0.65 (95?%CI 0.54?–?0.76). IOA was slight to fair (κ?=?0.04?–?0.32) for individual cytologic parameters. A final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the most significant predictor of agreement [OR 3.99 (CI 1.52?–?10.49)]. Conclusions: Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists for pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens is moderate-substantial for the final cytologic diagnosis. The final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the strongest predictor of agreement. These results have significant implications for patient management and need to be validated in future trials.
机译:背景与目的:细针穿刺内镜超声检查(EUS-FNA)已成为评估实体胰腺病变的护理标准。在评估固态胰腺EUS-FNA标本时,细胞病理学家之间关于观察者间协议(IOA)的数据有限。这项研究旨在评估细胞病理学家中的IOA,以使用新型标准化评分系统评估实体胰腺病变的EUS-FNA细胞学标本,并评估IOA的个别临床和细胞学指标。方法:包括在三级转诊中心接受EUS-FNA实性胰腺病变的连续患者。 EUS-FNA载玻片由四位盲细胞病理学家使用标准化评分系统进行评估,该评分系统评估最终的细胞学诊断和定量(有核/诊断细胞的数量)和定性(血肿,炎症/坏死,污染,伪影)细胞学参数。最终临床诊断基于最终细胞学,手术病理学或1年临床随访。?IOA使用多评分卡伯(κ)统计来计算。进行了双变量分析,比较了细胞病理学家中有或没有一致同意的病例,然后通过逻辑回归与向后消除来建模一致同意的可能性。结果:纳入了99例患者(男性49%,平均年龄64岁,平均病变大小26mm)。最终诊断的IOA为中度(κ?=?0.45,95 %%置信区间(CI)0.4?–?0.49),将可疑和恶性诊断合并使用时的改善很小(κ?=?0.54,95?%CI 0.49?– 0.6)。总体诊断的加权kappa值为0.65(95 %% CI为0.54?-?0.76)。对于个别细胞学参数,IOA为轻度至中度(κ?=?0.04?–?0.32)。对恶性肿瘤的最终临床诊断是一致性最高的预测指标[OR 3.99(CI 1.52?–?10.49)]。结论:胰腺EUS-FNA标本的细胞病理学家之间的观察员共识对于最终的细胞学诊断是中等程度的。恶性肿瘤的最终临床诊断是一致性最高的预测因子。这些结果对患者管理具有重大意义,需要在以后的试验中进行验证。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号