首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Evaluation of data concerning the necessity of isoxaflutole as a herbicide to control a serious danger to plant health which cannot be contained by other available means, including non‐chemical methods
【24h】

Evaluation of data concerning the necessity of isoxaflutole as a herbicide to control a serious danger to plant health which cannot be contained by other available means, including non‐chemical methods

机译:评估有关异恶草胺作为除草剂以控制对植物健康的严重危险的必要性的数据评估,而其他可用方法,包括非化学方法则无法遏制

获取原文
       

摘要

The European Food Safety Authority was requested by the European Commission to provide scientific assistance under Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 regarding the evaluation of data concerning the necessity of isoxaflutole as a herbicide to control a serious danger to plant health which cannot be contained by other available means including non‐chemical methods, in accordance with Article 4(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. In this context, EFSA organised a commenting phase with Member States in order to collect and validate the data submitted by the applicant. The current scientific report summarises the outcome of the evaluation of three different uses (maize, sweetcorn and poppy) in 10 Member States. The evaluation demonstrated that for two uses (maize and sweetcorn) insufficient or sufficient chemical alternatives are available, and for one use (poppy) insufficient chemical alternatives to isoxaflutole are available. The evaluation included an assessment of non‐chemical methods for the presented uses. A wide range of non‐chemical methods are available, however, often these methods do not have the same efficacy as chemical methods or have economic limitations. A combination of both chemical and non‐chemical methods seems often possible.
机译:欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局根据第(EC)178/2002号条例第31条提供科学援助,涉及评估有关异恶草酮作为除草剂来控制严重危害植物健康的必要性的数据根据(EC)第1107/2009号条例第4(7)条,通过其他可用手段(包括非化学方法)包含在内。在这方面,欧洲食品安全局与成员国组织了一个评议阶段,以收集和验证申请人提交的数据。当前的科学报告总结了10个成员国对三种不同用途(玉米,甜玉米和罂粟)的评估结果。评估表明,对于两种用途(玉米和甜玉米),可用的化学替代品不足或足够,对于一种用途(罂粟),可用的异氟沙丁胺化学替代品不足。评估包括对所提出用途的非化学方法的评估。可以使用各种各样的非化学方法,但是,这些方法通常不具有与化学方法相同的功效或存在经济限制。化学方法和非化学方法的结合似乎常常是可能的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《EFSA Journal》 |2017年第6期|共33页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 食品工业;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 10:04:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号