...
首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Phlebiopsis?gigantea strains VRA 1835, VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3
【24h】

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Phlebiopsis?gigantea strains VRA 1835, VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3

机译:对活性物质拟竹假单胞菌VRA 1835,VRA 1984和FOC PG 410.3农药风险评估的同行评审

获取原文

摘要

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Estonia and co‐rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance Phlebiopsis gigantea strains VRA 1835, VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of Phlebiopsis gigantea strains VRA 1835, VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3 as a fungicide (field use) on conifer forests: pine, spruce, larch. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
机译:在报告人成员国爱沙尼亚和共同报告国法国主管当局对农药活性物质巨大假单胞菌VRA 1835,VRA 1984和FOC进行的初始风险评估的同行评审之后,EFSA的结论报告了PG 410.3。同行评审的内容是欧盟委员会第844/2012号实施细则(经欧盟委员会第2018/1659号实施细则修订)所要求的。结论是根据对竹节菌(Phlebiopsis gigantea)菌株VRA 1835,VRA 1984和FOC PG 410.3在针叶林(松树,云杉,落叶松)上作为杀菌剂(田间使用)的代表性使用的评估得出的。介绍了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺少信息。确定了问题。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号