...
首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 77, Revision 1 (FGE.77Rev1): Consideration of Pyridine, Pyrrole and Quinoline Derivatives evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to Pyridine, Pyrrole, Indole and Quinoline Derivatives evaluated by EFSA in FGE.24Rev2 (2013)
【24h】

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 77, Revision 1 (FGE.77Rev1): Consideration of Pyridine, Pyrrole and Quinoline Derivatives evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to Pyridine, Pyrrole, Indole and Quinoline Derivatives evaluated by EFSA in FGE.24Rev2 (2013)

机译:关于调味组评估77的科学意见,修订版1(FGE.77Rev1):考虑JECFA(第63次会议)评估的吡啶,吡咯和喹啉衍生物与EFSA在FGE.24Rev2中评估的与吡啶,吡咯,吲哚和喹啉衍生物的结构相关( 2013)

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to consider evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000 by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA), and to decide whether further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. The present consideration concerns a group of 22 pyridine, pyrrole and quinoline derivatives evaluated by the JECFA (63rd meeting). The revision of this consideration is made since additional toxicity data have become available for isoquinoline [FL‐no: 14.001], pyrrole [FL‐no: 14.041] and 2‐acetylpyrrole [FL‐no: 14.047]. The toxicity data on 2‐acetylpyrrole should also cover 2‐propionylpyrrole [FL‐no: 14.068]. Further, additional genotoxicity data on 6‐methylquinoline [FL‐no: 14.042] have become available. The Panel concluded that for 6‐methylquinoline [FL‐no: 14.042], the new genotoxicity data did not clear the concern with respect to genotoxicity in vitro and accordingly the substance is not evaluated through the Procedure. For 18 substances [FL‐no: 14.001, 14.004, 14.007, 14.030, 14.038, 14.039, 14.041, 14.047, 14.058, 14.059, 14.060, 14.061, 14.065, 14.066, 14.068, 14.071, 14.072 and 14.164] considered in this FGE, the Panel agrees with the JECFA conclusion, “No safety concern at estimated levels of intake as flavouring substances” based on the MSDI approach. For three substances [FL‐no: 13.134, 14.045 and 14.046], additional toxicological data are still required. Besides the safety assessment of these flavouring substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been evaluated, and the information is considered adequate for all the substances.
机译:要求欧洲食品安全局食品接触材料,酶,调味剂和加工助剂小组考虑对粮农组织/世卫组织食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)自2000年以来评估的调味剂进行评估,并决定是否根据委员会法规(EC)1565/2000的规定,有必要进行进一步评估。本考虑事项涉及由JECFA(第六十三次会议)评估的22种吡啶,吡咯和喹啉衍生物。由于已经获得了异喹啉[FL-no:14.001],吡咯[FL-no:14.041]和2-乙酰基吡咯[FL-no:14.047]的其他毒性数据,因此对这一考虑进行了修订。 2-乙酰基吡咯的毒性数据也应涵盖2-丙酰基吡咯[FL-no:14.068]。此外,关于6-甲基喹啉[FL-no:14.042]的其他遗传毒性数据也已获得。专家组得出结论,对于6-甲基喹啉[FL-no:14.042],新的遗传毒性数据并未消除对体外遗传毒性的关注,因此该物质未通过该程序进行评估。对于本FGE中考虑的18种物质[FL-no:14.001、14.004、14.007、14.030、14.038、14.039、14.041、14.047、14.058、14.059、14.060、14.061、14.065、14.066、14.068、14.071、14.072和14.164],小组同意JECFA的结论,即基于MSDI方法的“食用香料的估计摄入量没有安全问题”。对于三种物质[FL-no:13.134、14.045和14.046],仍然需要其他毒理学数据。除了对这些调味物质的安全性进行评估之外,还对商业材料的规格进行了评估,并且认为该信息对于所有物质都足够。

著录项

  • 来源
    《EFSA Journal》 |2014年第2期|共50页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 食品工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号