首页> 外文期刊>Einstein (So Paulo) >Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
【24h】

Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence

机译:一项比较临床试验的长期结果,比较了单独的阴道刺激与联合治疗对压力性尿失禁妇女的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To determine the efficacy of stress urinary incontinence treatments adding pelvic floor muscle training to vaginal electrical stimulation.Methods Forty-eight women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized into 2 groups: 24 underwent isolated vaginal electrical stimulation, and 24 vaginal electrical stimulation plus pelvic floor muscle training. History, physical examination, voiding diary, perineum strength test, and urodynamic study were assessed. Comparisons were made for adherence to treatment, muscle strength improvement, urinary symptoms, and degree of satisfaction immediately, 12 and 96 months after treatment.Results Patients’ degree of satisfaction on vaginal electrical stimulation, and on vaginal electrical stimulation plus pelvic floor muscle training immediately, 12 and 96 months post treatment, were, respectively: 88.2%versus 88.9% 64.7% versus 61.1% and 42.9% versus 28.6% (p0.05).Conclusion Vaginal electrical stimulation associated to pelvic floor muscle training did not show better results than vaginal electrical stimulation alone.
机译:目的确定应激性尿失禁的治疗方法,并结合盆底肌训练对阴道电刺激进行治疗。方法将四十八名患有压力性尿失禁的妇女随机分为两组:24例行单纯性阴道电刺激,24例阴道电刺激加盆腔底肌肉训练。评估病史,体格检查,排尿日记,会阴强度测试和尿流动力学研究。比较治疗后12个月和96个月的治疗依从性,肌肉力量改善,泌尿症状和满意度,结果患者对阴道电刺激以及阴道电刺激加骨盆底肌肉训练的满意度分别在治疗后12个月和96个月:88.2%比88.9%64.7%对61.1%和42.9%对28.6%(p> 0.05)。结论与盆底肌肉训练相关的阴道电刺激没有比单独进行阴道电刺激。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号