首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002)
【24h】

Scientific Opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002)

机译:关于制定农药环境风险评估的具体保护目标备选方案的科学意见,尤其是与修订《水生和陆地生态毒理学指导文件》有关的科学意见(SANCO / 3268/2001和SANCO / 10329/2002)

获取原文
       

摘要

General protection goals are stated in European legislation but specific protection goals (SPGs) are not precisely defined. These are however crucial for designing appropriate risk assessment schemes. Here a process for defining SPG options is presented, which uses the ecosystem services approach as an overarching concept and could be used in consultation processes with risk managers and stakeholders. SPGs are defined in 6 dimensions: biological entity, attribute, magnitude of effect, temporal and geographical scale of the effect, and the degree of certainty that the specified level of effect will not be exceeded. SPG options are presented for 7 key drivers (microbes, algae, non target plants (aquatic and terrestrial), aquatic invertebrates, terrestrial non target arthropods including honeybees, terrestrial non‐arthropod invertebrates, and vertebrates), covering all ecosystem services which could potentially be affected by the use of pesticides. To ensure ecosystem services, taxa representative for the key drivers identified need to be protected at the population level or higher. However, for aesthetic reasons (cultural ecosystem services) it may be decided to protect vertebrates at the individual level. To protect biodiversity, impacts at least need to be assessed at the scale of the watershed/landscape. The Panel also emphasizes the importance of a tiered approach for risk assessment, the essential linking of exposure and effect assessments in terms of spatial and temporal scales, and the relevance of ecological scenarios for appropriate pesticide risk assessments. It intends to use the presented concepts as input for the dialogue between risk managers and risk assessors during the next steps of the revision of the Ecotoxicology Guidance Documents.
机译:总体保护目标已在欧洲法规中阐明,但具体的保护目标(SPG)却没有精确定义。但是,这些对于设计适当的风险评估方案至关重要。这里介绍了定义SPG选项的过程,该过程使用生态系统服务方法作为总体概念,可用于与风险管理者和利益相关者的协商过程。 SPG定义为6个维度:生物实体,属性,效应的大小,效应的时间和地理范围以及确定的效应水平不会超过的确定程度。提供了针对7种主要驱动因素(微生物,藻类,非目标植物(水生和陆地),水生无脊椎动物,陆地非目标节肢动物(包括蜜蜂),陆地非节肢动物无脊椎动物和脊椎动物)的SPG选项,涵盖了所有可能为受农药使用的影响。为了确保生态系统服务,已确定主要驱动因素的分类单元代表需要在人口或更高水平上得到保护。但是,出于审美原因(文化生态系统服务),可以决定在个人层面上保护脊椎动物。为了保护生物多样性,至少需要在流域/景观的规模上评估影响。小组还强调了风险评估采用分层方法的重要性,就空间和时间尺度而言,暴露和影响评估的必要联系,以及生态情景与适当农药风险评估的相关性。它打算在修订生态毒理学指导文件的后续步骤中,使用提出的概念作为风险管理者与风险评估者之间对话的输入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号