首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to EffEXT? and maintenance of normal joint mobility pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
【24h】

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to EffEXT? and maintenance of normal joint mobility pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

机译:关于证实与 Eff EXT 有关的健康声明的科学见解?和根据(EC)1924/2006号条例第13(5)条,维持正常的联合机动性

获取原文
           

摘要

Following an application from Nutrilinks Sarl, submitted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Belgium, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to Eff _(EXT)? and maintenance of normal joint mobility. The Panel considers that Eff _(EXT)?, which is standardised pure krill oil, is sufficiently characterised. The claimed effect proposed by the applicant is “contributes to support joint flexibility”. The Panel considers that maintenance of normal joint mobility is a beneficial physiological effect. The applicant identified one human intervention study as being pertinent to the health claim. The Panel notes that chronic inflammation was an inclusion criterion of the study, that a significant number of the patients recruited were reported to have confirmed diagnosis of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or of both cardiovascular disease and osteoarthritis, and that the WOMAC osteoarthritis questionnaire was administered only to patients with arthritic disease (osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis). The Panel also notes that no evidence which could justify the extrapolation of the results, obtained in patients with joint diseases characterised by chronic inflammation, to the target population, subjects without chronic joint diseases, was provided by the applicant. The Panel considers that no conclusions can be drawn from this study for the scientific substantiation of the claim. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of Eff _(EXT)? and maintenance of normal joint mobility.
机译:在Nutrilinks Sarl根据比利时法规(EC)第1924/2006条第13条第5款通过比利时主管当局提交的申请之后,要求营养产品,营养和过敏专门委员会(NDA)提出意见。与 Eff _(EXT)有关的健康声明的科学依据?和维持正常的关节活动度。小组认为,标准化的纯磷虾油Eff _(EXT)?具有足够的特性。申请人提出的要求保护的效果是“有助于支持联合灵活性”。小组认为,维持正常的关节活动性是有益的生理作用。申请人确定一项与健康声称有关的人为干预研究。专家小组指出,慢性炎症是该研究的一项纳入标准,据报道,招募的许多患者已确诊骨关节炎,类风湿性关节炎或心血管疾病和骨关节炎,并已提交WOMAC骨关节炎问卷仅适用于患有关节炎疾病(骨关节炎或类风湿关节炎)的患者。专家小组还注意到,申请人没有提供任何证据可以证明将以慢性炎症为特征的关节疾病患者中的结果外推至没有慢性关节疾病的受试者的目标人群。小组认为,就索赔的科学依据而言,无法从这项研究得出任何结论。专家组的结论是,消费 Eff _(EXT)之间尚未建立因果关系?和维持正常的关节活动度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号