首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia >Quality of MRI pediatric sedation: Comparison between intramuscular and intravenous dexmedetomidine
【24h】

Quality of MRI pediatric sedation: Comparison between intramuscular and intravenous dexmedetomidine

机译:MRI小儿镇静剂的质量:肌内右美托咪定与静脉内右美托咪定的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The study was designed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine whether given intramuscular or intravenous for pediatric MRI sedation. Subjects and methods Ninety children between the ages of 2 and 8 years with ASA physical status I–II, scheduled for elective MRI, were enrolled in a double blind, comparative randomized study. Patients assigned into two equal groups. Group DV, sedation was performed using IV dexmedetomidine hydrochloride; a loading dose of 1 μg/kg administered over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion at 1 μg/kg/h. Group DM where the patient received IM dexmedetomidine 3 μg/kg. Primary endpoints included incidence of failed sedation and the requirement of midazolam supplementation. Secondary endpoints were time to sedation, duration of sedation, discharge time, and hemodynamic status. Results The sedation failure rate was significantly higher in the DV group (40%) in comparison with the DM group (20%) ( P = 0.04). Also, the use of rescue midazolam was significantly higher in the VD group (0.37 ± 0.47 mg) in comparison to the DM group (0.17 ± 0.35 mg) ( P = 0.025). The onset of satisfactory sedation was significantly shorter in DV group in comparison to DM group (7.93 ± 0.884 vs. 16.87 ± 4.49). Also, the discharge time was significantly less in the DV group (32.27 ± 3.04 min) in comparison to DM group (41.87 ± 5.80 min). Patients in DV group had significantly lower MBP compared to patients in DM group after receiving dexmedetomidine ( p 0.05). Although the HR decreased in both groups during the MRI study, the decrease was statistically significant in the DV group compared to the DM group in the period extended from the 2nd to 35th min ( p 0.05). Conclusion In pediatric MRI sedation, although IM dexmedetomidine does have a late sedation onset; it reduces the sedation failure rate, the need for supplement sedation and the incidence of hemodynamic instability associated with IV dexmedetomidine.
机译:目的本研究旨在比较右美托咪定肌肉注射或静脉内给予小儿MRI镇静的疗效。研究对象和方法计划进行择期MRI检查的2至8岁ASA身体状态I–II的90名儿童参加了一项双盲,比较随机研究。将患者分为两组。 DV组,使用IV右美托咪定盐酸盐进行镇静;在10分钟内给予1μg/ kg的负荷剂量,然后以1μg/ kg / h的速度连续输注。 DM组,患者接受IM右美托咪定3μg/ kg。主要终点包括镇静失败的发生率和补充咪达唑仑的需要。次要终点是镇静时间,镇静时间,出院时间和血液动力学状态。结果DV组(40%)的镇静失败率明显高于DM组(20%)(P = 0.04)。另外,与DM组(0.17±0.35 mg)相比,VD组(0.37±0.47 mg)使用抢救性咪达唑仑的比例明显更高(P = 0.025)。与DM组相比,DV组令人满意的镇静作用明显缩短(7.93±0.884 vs. 16.87±4.49)。此外,与DM组(41.87±5.80分钟)相比,DV组(32.27±3.04分钟)的放电时间明显更少。接受右美托咪定后,DV组患者的MBP明显低于DM组(p <0.05)。尽管在MRI研究期间两组的HR均降低,但从DM组开始的第2分钟至第35分钟,HR的降低与DM组相比具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。结论在小儿MRI镇静中,尽管IM右美托咪定确实有较晚的镇静作用;它可以降低镇静失败率,补充镇静剂的需要以及与静脉内右美托咪定相关的血液动力学不稳定的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号