...
首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on monitoring procedures at slaughterhouses for bovines
【24h】

Scientific Opinion on monitoring procedures at slaughterhouses for bovines

机译:关于牛屠宰场监控程序的科学意见

获取原文

摘要

This scientific opinion proposes toolboxes of welfare indicators for developing monitoring procedures at slaughterhouses for bovines stunned with penetrative captive bolt or slaughtered without stunning. In particular, the opinion proposes welfare indicators together with their corresponding outcomes of consciousness, unconsciousness or death. In the case of slaughter with captive bolt stunning, the opinion proposes a toolbox of indicators and the outcomes to be used to assess consciousness in bovine animals at three key stages of monitoring: (a) after stunning and during shackling and hoisting; (b) during neck cutting or sticking; and (c) during bleeding. For slaughter of bovines without stunning, a set of indicators and outcomes are proposed in another toolbox to be used for (a) assessing unconsciousness, before releasing bovines from restraint; and (b) confirming death before carcass dressing begins. Various activities‐including a systematic literature review, an online survey and stakeholders’ and hearing experts’ meetings‐were conducted to gather information about the specificity, sensitivity and feasibility of the indicators that can be included in the toolboxes. The frequency of checking differs according to the role of each person responsible for ensuring animal welfare. Personnel performing stunning, shackling, hoisting and/or bleeding will have to check all the animals and confirm that they are not conscious following stunning or before release from the restraint. For the animal welfare officer, who has the overall responsibility for animal welfare, a mathematical model for the sampling protocols is proposed, giving some allowance to set the sample size of animals that he/she needs to check at a given throughput rate (total number of animals slaughtered in the slaughterhouse) and tolerance level (number of potential failures). Finally, different risk factors and scenarios are proposed to define a ‘normal’ or a ‘reinforced’ monitoring protocol, according to the needs of the slaughterhouse.
机译:该科学意见提出了福利指标工具箱,用于制定在屠宰场对用穿透性俘获螺栓惊呆或不击晕的屠宰牛的监测程序。该意见尤其提出了福利指标及其相应的意识,无意识或死亡结果。对于用栓子击昏进行宰杀的情况,意见提出了一个指标和结果工具箱,用于在监测的三个关键阶段评估牛动物的意识:(a)击晕后以及在缩和吊装期间; (b)在切割或粘着脖子时; (c)出血期间。为了屠宰牛而又不击晕,在另一个工具箱中提出了一组指标和结果,这些指标和结果可用于(a)评估失去知觉,然后使牛摆脱束缚; (b)在car体换药开始之前确认死亡。进行了各种活动,包括系统的文献综述,在线调查以及利益相关者和听觉专家的会议,以收集有关可以包含在工具箱中的指标的特异性,敏感性和可行性的信息。检查的频率根据负责确保动物福利的每个人的角色而有所不同。进行击晕,缩,吊起和/或出血的人员将必须检查所有动物,并确认击晕后或从约束装置中释放出来之前它们没有意识。对于全面负责动物福利的动物福利官员,提出了一种用于采样方案的数学模型,并允许在给定的通量率下设置他/她需要检查的动物的样本数量(总数)在屠宰场屠宰的动物数量)和耐受水平(潜在失败的数量)。最后,根据屠宰场的需求,提出了不同的风险因素和方案来定义“正常”或“强化”监控方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号