首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 6: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2017
【24h】

Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 6: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2017

机译:通知EFSA 6的有意添加到食品或饲料中的QPS推荐生物制剂清单的更新:通知EFSA的生物分类单位是否适用至2017年3月

获取原文
       

摘要

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre‐evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents performed by EFSA's scientific Panels. The identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance of valid taxonomic units were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ which should be assessed at the strain level by the EFSA's scientific Panels. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS taxonomic units and their qualifications. Between the end of September 2016 and March 2017, the QPS notification list was updated with 87 applications for market authorisation. From these, 32 biological agents already had a QPS status, and 37 were not included in the evaluation as they are filamentous fungi or enterococci. Streptomyces species (Streptomyces cinnamonensis, Streptomyces mobaraensis and Streptomyces violaceoruber), Bacillus circulans (three notifications) and Escherichia coli (seven notifications) were re‐confirmed not suitable for QPS. Streptomyces rubiginosus and Streptomyces netropsis, not evaluated within the previous mandate, were also not recommended for QPS. Streptomyces spp. and E. coli will be excluded from further QPS evaluations within the current QPS mandate. Hyphomicrobium denitrificans, which has never been evaluated before, was not recommended for the QPS list and for Pseudomonas amyloderamosa, the QPS assessment was not applicable because it is not a validated species. Lactobacillus animalis was a new taxonomic unit recommended to have the QPS status.
机译:提出了合格的安全性推定(QPS)概念,以提供统一的通用预评估,以支持EFSA科学小组对生物制剂进行安全风险评估。评估了有效分类单位的身份,知识体系,安全性和抗菌素耐药性。对于分类单元确定的安全问题,在可能的范围内和合理的数量上应反映为“资格”,应由EFSA的科学专家组在菌株级别进行评估。没有发现新的信息会改变以前推荐的QPS分类单位及其资格。在2016年9月底至2017年3月之间,QPS通知列表已更新,其中包含87个市场授权申请。从中,已经有32种生物制剂具有QPS状态,并且37种生物制剂是丝状真菌或肠球菌,因此未包括在评估中。再次确认了链霉菌种(肉桂链霉菌,mobaraensis链霉菌和violaceoruber链霉菌),圆形芽孢杆菌(三个通知)和大肠杆菌(七个通知)不适合QPS。不推荐在先前的任务中未评估的红链链霉菌和链霉菌netropsis用于QPS。链霉菌在目前的QPS规定范围内,进一步的QPS评估将排除大肠杆菌和大肠杆菌。不建议将以前从未进行过评估的反硝化微生物列入QPS清单,而对于淀粉假单胞菌则不建议使用QPS评估,因为它不是经过验证的物种。动物乳杆菌是被推荐具有QPS地位的新的分类单位。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号