首页> 外文期刊>Isra Medical Journal >Efficacy, Post-Operative Pain and Complications of Quilting Septal Sutures versus Intranasal Pres-sure Splints in Cases of Septoplasty without Nasal Packing; A Randomized Control Trial
【24h】

Efficacy, Post-Operative Pain and Complications of Quilting Septal Sutures versus Intranasal Pres-sure Splints in Cases of Septoplasty without Nasal Packing; A Randomized Control Trial

机译:在没有鼻腔填充的情况下进行Qui缝间隔缝合与鼻内压力夹板的疗效,术后疼痛和并发症;随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy, post-operative pain and complications of quilting septal sutures versus intranasal pressure splintsin cases of septoplasty without nasal packing.STUDY DESIGN: A Randomized Controlled Trial.PLACE AND DURATION: At Department of ENT, CMH Bahawalpur from 1st January 2015 to 1st January 2016.METHODOLOGY: Total 105 patients who underwent septoplasty and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly divided in twogroups. Patients of Group A underwent septal suturing technique and Group B had intranasal pressure splints. Both the techniqueswere compared for their efficacy, post-operative pain and complications (synechie, septal perforation) on the operation day, 1stpost op day and 1 week after operation. Efficacy of both the techniques was assessed in terms of prevention of bleeding and septalhematoma. Complications including adhesions/synechie and septal perforations were also observed and compared.RESULTS: On the operation day 7.6% patients of Group A had nasal bleeding while only 1.8% patients in group B. No bleeding wasseen on first post-operative day or even after that. Group A patients had significantly less pain on the evening of operation dayas compared to Group B, and also on day 7 when intranasal splints were removed from patients in Group B. No patient of eithergroup developed septal hematoma or septal perforations. However, there were 11.5% cases of group A who developed synechie/adhesions as compared to 1.8% of Group B.CONCLUSION: Although Intranasal pressure splints are more painful than septal sutures but show fewer complications making it apreferred way of septoplasty.
机译:目的:比较无鼻腔隔成形术中sep缝隔缝与鼻内夹板缝合的疗效,术后疼痛和并发症的发生情况研究设计:随机对照试验位置和时间:2015年1月1日在CMH Bahawalpur耳鼻喉科方法:自2016年1月1日至2016年1月1日,方法:将105例行隔膜成形术并符合入组标准的患者随机分为两组。 A组患者接受中隔缝合技术,B组患者具有鼻内压板。比较了这两种技术的疗效,术后疼痛和术后并发症(先兆,间隔穿孔),术后第1天和术后1周的并发症。从预防出血和间隔血肿的角度评估了这两种技术的有效性。结果:在手术当天,A组有7.6%的患者鼻出血,而B组只有1.8%的鼻出血。术后第一天甚至术后均未见出血。那。与B组相比,A组患者在手术当天的疼痛明显减轻,B组患者去除鼻内夹板的疼痛在第7天也明显减轻。两组患者均未出现中隔血肿或中隔穿孔。然而,A组有11.5%的病例发生了粘连/粘连,而B组为1.8%。结论:尽管鼻内压夹板比隔缝缝合更痛苦,但并发症较少,因此是首选的隔膜成形术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号