首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Green Journal >Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth
【24h】

Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the earth

机译:我们的生态足迹:减少人类对地球的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Review: Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. By Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees Reviewed by Gene Bazan Center for Sustainability, Pennsylvania State University Wackernagel, Mathis and William Rees. Our Ecological Footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers, 1996. 160 pp. US $14.94 paper ISBN: 0-86571-312-X. Partially recycled, acid-free paper using soy-based ink. If the earth's inhabitants were to live at the standard of the U.S., we would require three planet Earths to support us. Many of us have heard or read something like this before. Our Ecological Footprint provides a graphically compelling and quantitatively rigorous way for us to engage in the worldwide sustainability debate: Ecological Footprint analysis. Through this analysis we can determine the consequences of our behavior, and proposed solutions, at any level: individual, household, community, nation, or world. Ecological Footprint analysis measures the aggregate land area required for a given population to exist in a sustainable manner. Wackernagel and Rees note that at 11 acres per person, the U.S. has the highest per capita footprint and suggest that this number should be closer to 6 acres per person. Further, the U.S. faces an 80% ecological deficit, which means we are borrowing from our grandchildren's legacy, and expropriating land from elsewhere in the world. By contrast, each European requires around 5 acres; however, Europeans face higher ecological deficits because they have smaller land areas. Unlike other approaches, which focus on the depletion of non-renewables such as fossil fuel and minerals, Ecological Footprint analysis asserts that the road to sustainability must be paved with sustainable practices. Thus, our use of fossil fuel must have as a compensatory sink the acres of woodlot required to sequester the carbon from our combustion of fossil fuel (in our cars, home heating, etc.) or, alternatively, the acres of fields required to grow biofuel. For example, in comparing our daily commute by car, bus or bicycle, and considering all land requirements (e.g., manufacturing land to produce
机译:评论:我们的生态足迹:减少人类对地球的影响。宾夕法尼亚州立大学吉恩·巴赞可持续发展中心评论,马西斯·瓦克纳格尔和威廉·里斯。我们的生态足迹:减少人类对地球的影响。费城,宾夕法尼亚州:新社会出版社,1996年。160页,US $ 14.94纸,ISBN:0-86571-312-X。使用大豆墨水的部分回收的无酸纸。如果地球上的居民要按照美国的标准生活,我们将需要三个地球来支持我们。我们很多人以前都听过或读过类似的东西。我们的生态足迹为我们参与全球可持续性辩论提供了一种图形上引人入胜且在数量上严格的方法:生态足迹分析。通过此分析,我们可以确定我们行为的后果以及所建议的解决方案,无论是在个人,家庭,社区,国家还是全世界。生态足迹分析以可持续的方式衡量给定人口所需的总土地面积。 Wackernagel和Rees指出,美国的人均足迹最高,为每人11英亩,并建议该数字应接近每人6英亩。此外,美国面临着80%的生态赤字,这意味着我们正在从孙辈的遗产中借钱,并从世界其他地方征收土地。相比之下,每个欧洲人需要约5英亩土地;但是,欧洲人由于土地面积较小而面临更高的生态赤字。与其他专注于消耗化石燃料和矿物等不可再生能源的方法不同,生态足迹分析认为,通往可持续性之路必须以可持续性实践铺平道路。因此,我们使用化石燃料必须具有一定的林地面积作为补偿汇,以从化石燃料燃烧(在我们的汽车,家庭供暖系统等)中隔离碳,或者将其增长所需的耕地面积作为隔离区。生物燃料。例如,在比较我们每天乘汽车,公共汽车或自行车的通勤时,并考虑所有土地需求(例如,生产要生产的土地)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号