首页> 外文期刊>In die Skriflig >Paul and love patriarchalism: Problems and prospects
【24h】

Paul and love patriarchalism: Problems and prospects

机译:保罗与父权制爱:问题与前景

获取原文
       

摘要

The term “love patriarchalism” (Liebespatriarchalismus) was coined in the 1970s by Gerd Theissen in his seminal sociological studies on Paul and the Corinthian community. The idea of “love patriarchalism” itself goes back to Ernst Troeltsch, who in his publication, Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen und Gruppen (1912), described the social relations of early Christian, in particular in Pauline communities, as representing a “Typus des christlichen Patriarchalismus”. Troeltsch stressed the conservative basic outlook of this strand of Christianity, and noted that this "religi?se Patriarchalismus" was marked by the ideal of love, a hierarchic church structure, and a certain view of family relations.

The Troeltsch-Theissen concept has been criticised by feminist and liberation-theological scholars for its political conservatism. While this criticism is understandable, but in itself no less politically conditioned, the exegetical problems rather lie in the generalising nature of the concept. However, it depicts one extremely influential post-Pauline stream of tradition, and raises vital questions concerning Paul's contribution to this development.
机译:“爱父权制”(Liebespatriarchalismus)一词由Gerd Theissen在1970年代对Paul和Corinthian社区进行的开创性社会学研究中提出。 “爱父权制”的思想本身可以追溯到恩斯特·特罗尔特施(Ernst Troeltsch),他在其著作《社会主义的死亡》(Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen und Gruppen,1912年)中描述了早期基督教徒的社会关系,特别是在波琳社区。 christlichen Patriarchalismus”。 Troeltsch强调了这种基督教信仰的保守基本观点,并指出这种“宗教父权制”的特征是爱的理想,等级制度的教会结构和对家庭关系的某些看法。

Troeltsch-Theissen概念因其政治保守主义而受到女权主义者和解放神学学者的批评。尽管这种批评是可以理解的,但其本身在政治上也有一定条件,但训ege问题在于概念的概括性。但是,它描绘了波林时代后极具影响力的传统流派,并提出了有关保罗对这一发展的贡献的重要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号