首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Journal of Radiology >Variability and Reliability of Normal Liver 18F-FDG Standardized Uptake Value in Relation to Placement of Volume of Interest (NUCLEAR MEDICINE)
【24h】

Variability and Reliability of Normal Liver 18F-FDG Standardized Uptake Value in Relation to Placement of Volume of Interest (NUCLEAR MEDICINE)

机译:正常肝脏18F-FDG标准化摄取值相对于目标体积位置的变异性和可靠性(NUCLEAR MEDICINE)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The impact of volume-of-interest (VOI) placement on liver standardized-uptake-value (SUV) measurement remains unclear. Objectives: To investigate variability and reliability of liver SUV in relation to placement of VOI within the right lobe of the liver. Patients and Methods: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) of 343 patients with normal liver were retrieved. Liver mean SUV (SUVmean) were measured by placing spherical VOIs at upper, portal vein and lower level of the right-lobe liver. The general linear model, Bland-Altman analysis, one-way ANOVA were performed and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to identify impacts of reader and VOI position on variations of liver SUVmean. Results: The liver SUVmean at the upper, lower and portal vein level were 1. 85 0. 435, 1. 88 0. 409, and 1. 89 0. 414, respectively, with no significant inter-location difference (P = 0. 449). The coefficients of variation were close among locations (21. 9%-23. 5%). The inter-location ICCs controlling for reader were 0. 955 for reader 1 and 0. 980 for reader 2, while the inter-reader ICCs controlling for location were between 0. 930 and 0. 937, indicating great reliability and reproducibility. However, inter-reader bias of SUVmean were significantly different among locations (P 0. 001). Bias at portal vein level (0. 069 0. 112) was significantly larger than those at the upper level (0. 004 0. 144, P 0. 001) and lower level (0. 002 0. 136, P 0. 001). Conclusion: Liver SUVmean measured by placing VOI at the portal vein level exhibited a relatively larger variation and less precision between readers, which was not recommended.
机译:背景:感兴趣体积(VOI)放置对肝脏标准化摄取值(SUV)测量的影响尚不清楚。目的:探讨与VOI在肝右叶内位置相关的肝SUV的变异性和可靠性。患者与方法:检索343例正常肝脏患者的正电子发射断层扫描计算机断层扫描(PET / CT)。肝平均SUV(SUVmean)通过在右叶肝的上,门静脉和下水平放置球形VOI来测量。进行了一般线性模型,Bland-Altman分析,单向方差分析,并计算了组内相关系数(ICC)以识别阅读器和VOI位置对肝脏SUVmean变化的影响。结果:上,下和门静脉水平的肝SUVmean分别为1. 85 0. 435、1。88 0. 409和1. 89 0. 414,而位间差异无显着性(P = 0 (第449章)。位置之间的变异系数接近(21. 9%-23。5%)。控制阅读器的位置间ICC对于阅读器1为0. 955,对于阅读器2为0.980。而控制位置的阅读器之间的ICC在0.930和0.937之间,表明具有很高的可靠性和可重复性。但是,不同位置之间SUVmean的读者间偏差存在显着差异(P <0. 001)。门静脉水平(0. 069 0. 112)的偏倚显着大于较高水平(0. 004 0. 144,P <0. 001)和较低水平(0. 002 0. 136,P <0 001)。结论:通过在门静脉水平放置VOI测得的肝SUVmean在阅读器之间表现出较大的变化和较低的准确性,因此不建议使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号