...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout ( Salmo trutta )
【24h】

Potential of a no‐take marine reserve to protect home ranges of anadromous brown trout ( Salmo trutta )

机译:不准捕捞的海洋保护区有可能保护褐鳟的家养范围(Salmo trutta)

获取原文
           

摘要

The extent to which no‐take marine reserves can benefit anadromous species requires examination. Here, we used acoustic telemetry to investigate the spatial behavior of anadromous brown trout (sea trout, Salmo trutta ) in relation to a small marine reserve (~1.5?km 2 ) located inside a fjord on the Norwegian Skagerrak coast. On average, sea trout spent 42.3 % (±5.0% SE ) of their time in the fjord within the reserve, a proportion similar to the area of the reserve relative to that of the fjord. On average, sea trout tagged inside the reserve received the most protection, although the level of protection decreased marginally with increasing home range size. Furthermore, individuals tagged outside the reserve received more protection with increasing home range size, potentially opposing selection toward smaller home range sizes inflicted on fish residing within reserves, or through selective fishing methods like angling. Monthly sea trout home ranges in the marine environment were on average smaller than the reserve, with a mean of 0.430 (±0.0265 SE )?km 2 . Hence, the reserve is large enough to protect the full home range of some individuals residing in the reserve. Synthesis and applications : In general, the reserve protects sea trout to a varying degree depending on their individual behavior. These findings highlight evolutionary implications of spatial protection and can guide managers in the design of marine reserves and networks that preserve variation in target species' home range size and movement behavior.
机译:禁止捕捞的海洋保护区可在多大程度上有益于有害物种。在这里,我们使用声学遥测技术研究了褐藻鳟(海鳟,Salmo trutta)相对于挪威Skagerrak海岸峡湾内的一个小型海洋保护区(〜1.5?km 2)的空间行为。平均而言,海鳟的时间占保护区内峡湾的时间的42.3%(±5.0%SE),这一比例与保护区面积相对于峡湾的比例相似。平均而言,标记在保护区内的海鳟获得了最大的保护,尽管随着家庭范围的扩大,保护水平略有下降。此外,被标记在保护区之外的个体会随着家庭范围的扩大而获得更多的保护,可能会反对选择居住在保护区内的鱼类造成的较小家庭范围的选择,或者是通过选择性的钓鱼方法(例如钓鱼)来进行。海洋环境中的每月鳟鱼栖息地平均范围小于保护区,平均范围为0.430(±0.0265 SE)?km 2。因此,保护​​区足够大,可以保护居住在该保护区中的某些人的整个房屋范围。综合与应用:一般而言,该保护区可根据其个人行为在不同程度上保护海鳟。这些发现凸显了空间保护的进化意义,并可以指导管理人员设计保护目标物种居住范围大小和运动行为变化的海洋保护区和网络。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号