首页> 外文期刊>Iran Agricultural Research >An evaluation of genetic algorithm method compared to geostatistical and neural network methods to estimate saturated soil hydraulic conductivity using soil texture
【24h】

An evaluation of genetic algorithm method compared to geostatistical and neural network methods to estimate saturated soil hydraulic conductivity using soil texture

机译:与地统计和神经网络方法相比较的遗传算法方法评估,利用土壤质地估算饱和土壤导水率

获取原文
           

摘要

Determining hydraulic conductivity of soil is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming. In this study, Algorithm Genetic and geostatistical analysis and Neural Networks method are used to estimate soil saturated hydraulic conductivity using the properties of particle size distribution. The data were gathered from 134soil profiles from soil and lander form studies of the Ardabil Agricultural Organization. Results showed that Or denary cokriging has the best fit for the geostatistical methods. The best-fitted vario gram was the exponential model with anugget effect of 0 cm day-1 and sill of 156 cm day-1 which is the strength of the spatial structure and full effect of the structural components on the vario gram model for the region; also, in the or denary cokriging method, an accurate estimate was obtained using R2 = 0.93 and RMSE = 3.21.Multilayer perceptron (MLP) network used the Levenberg- Marquardt (trainlm) algorithm with are gression coefficient (R2) of 0.997 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.22 to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil. For GA model, parameters of root mean square error (RMSE) cm day-1 and the coefficient of determination (R2) were determined as 1.35 and 0.926, respectively. Performance evaluation of the models showed that the Neural Networks model compared with geostatistical analysis and genetic algorithm was able to predict soil hydraulic conductivity with high and more accuracy and results of this method was closer to the measurement results.
机译:确定土壤的水力传导率是困难,昂贵和费时的。在这项研究中,使用遗传算法和地统计学分析以及神经网络方法,利用粒径分布的特性估算土壤的饱和导水率。数据来自Ardabil农业组织的土壤和着陆器形式研究中的134种土壤剖面。结果表明,Or denary cokriging最适合地统计方法。最适合的vario gram是指数模型,其模型作用为0 cm day-1的基石效应和156 cm day-1的底线,这是该区域的vario gram模型的空间结构强度和结构成分的全部作用;同样,在或否定协同克里金法中,使用R2 = 0.93和RMSE = 3.21可获得准确的估计。多层感知器(MLP)网络使用Levenberg-Marquardt(trainlm)算法,且回归系数(R2)为0.997和均方根平方误差(RMSE)为1.22,以估计饱和土壤的水力传导率。对于GA模型,均方根误差(RMSE)cm day-1和确定系数(R2)的参数分别确定为1.35和0.926。模型的性能评估表明,与地统计分析和遗传算法相比,神经网络模型能够更准确,更准确地预测土壤水力传导率,并且该方法的结果更接近于测量结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号