...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability >Analysis of social-ecological dynamics driving conflict in linked surface-groundwater systems
【24h】

Analysis of social-ecological dynamics driving conflict in linked surface-groundwater systems

机译:地表水-地下水联动系统中驱动冲突的社会生态动力学分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Conflict over water resources emerges from complex interactions among biophysical, social, and economic processes operating at multiple scales. Competing use of linked surface-groundwater (LSGW) resources is an excellent yet relatively unexplored example of such conflict. Dynamic circumstances surrounding the contested installation of a high capacity municipal well in southeastern Wisconsin were examined through the theoretical lens of adaptive governance using document analysis and open-ended key stakeholder interviews. A framework analysis method extracted 16 controlling variables from the qualitative data. These controlling variables were placed on a threshold matrix at their appropriate geospatial scale (Property, Watershed, State) and process domain (Biophysical, Economic, Social), which revealed several social-ecological feedbacks not currently addressed by management authorities. Three dynamic feedback loops were identified that explain the emergence and resolution of LSGW conflict in the case study area. Conflict emerged when processes driving new development in southeastern Wisconsin threatened to impact a highly valued groundwater dependent lake. Lake groups engaged in collective learning, utilized information networks, and displayed leadership to address the issue. However, lack of participatory avenues for dispute resolution at the scale of occurrence drove lake groups to challenge the regulatory authority of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). Through order-based legitimacy, legal resolution affected governance of LSGW resources across the state, but did little to address the underlying stakeholder values driving conflict. We conclude this system will continue to be subjected to “legal back and forth,” recurrent conflict, and uncertainty for both environmental and developmental interests until a more participatory process is developed with regulatory authorities to resolve conflicts over LSGW.
机译:水资源冲突源于多种规模的生物物理,社会和经济过程之间的复杂相互作用。竞争性地使用相连的地表地下水(LSGW)资源是这种冲突的一个极好的例子,但尚未得到充分探索。通过使用文件分析和不限成员名额关键利益相关者访谈的适应性治理的理论视角,考察了威斯康星州东南部有争议的高容量市政井的安装的动态情况。框架分析方法从定性数据中提取了16个控制变量。将这些控制变量以适当的地理空间尺度(属性,分水岭,州)和过程域(生物物理,经济,社会)放置在阈值矩阵上,这揭示了管理机构当前未解决的一些社会生态反馈。确定了三个动态反馈循环,这些循环解释了案例研究区域中LSGW冲突的出现和解决。当推动威斯康星州东南部新开发的进程威胁要影响一个高度依赖地下水的湖泊时,就会出现冲突。湖区团体从事集体学习,利用信息网络,并发挥领导作用来解决这一问题。然而,由于缺乏参与性解决争端的途径,导致湖泊群向威斯康星州自然资源部(WDNR)的监管机构提出了挑战。通过基于订单的合法性,法律解决方案影响了全州LSGW资源的治理,但对于解决潜在的利益相关者价值观念并没有推动冲突产生了什么影响。我们得出结论,直到监管机构制定了解决LSGW冲突的更具参与性的程序之前,该系统将继续遭受“法律来回”,反复发生的冲突以及环境和发展利益的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号