...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not
【24h】

Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not

机译:入侵性豆类可以与许多本地豆类的互惠主义者交往,但通常不会

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Mutualistic interactions can strongly influence species invasions, as the inability to form successful mutualisms in an exotic range could hamper a host's invasion success. This barrier to invasion may be overcome if an invader either forms novel mutualistic associations or finds and associates with familiar mutualists in the exotic range. Here, we ask (1) does the community of rhizobial mutualists associated with invasive legumes in their exotic range overlap with that of local native legumes and (2) can any differences be explained by fundamental incompatibilities with particular rhizobial genotypes? To address these questions, we first characterized the rhizobial communities naturally associating with three invasive and six native legumes growing in the San Francisco Bay Area. We then conducted a greenhouse experiment to test whether the invasive legume could nodulate with any of a broad array of rhizobia found in their exotic range. There was little overlap between the Bradyrhizobium communities associated with wild-grown invasive and native legumes, yet the invasive legumes could nodulate with a broad range of rhizobial strains under greenhouse conditions. These observations suggest that under field conditions in their exotic range, these invasive legumes are not currently associating with the mutualists of local native legumes, despite their potential to form such associations. However, the promiscuity with which these invading legumes can form mutualistic associations could be an important factor early in the invasion process if mutualist scarcity limits range expansion. Overall, the observation that invasive legumes have a community of rhizobia distinct from that of native legumes, despite their ability to associate with many rhizobial strains, challenges existing assumptions about how invading species obtain their mutualists. These results can therefore inform current and future efforts to prevent and remove invasive species.
机译:摘要相互影响可以极大地影响物种的入侵,因为无法在异域范围内形成成功的共生关系可能会阻碍宿主的入侵成功。如果入侵者建立了新颖的互助协会,或者发现并与异国情调的熟悉的互助者建立联系,则可以克服这种入侵的障碍。在这里,我们问(1)与入侵豆科植物在其异国范围内相关联的根瘤菌共生者群落是否与当地本地豆科植物的群落重叠;(2)是否可以通过与特定根瘤菌基因型的基本不相容性来解释任何差异?为了解决这些问题,我们首先对在旧金山湾地区种植的三种入侵性豆科植物和六种当地豆科植物进行自然鉴定,将其归为根瘤菌群落。然后,我们进行了温室实验,以测试入侵性豆科植物是否能够与异国范围内发现的多种根瘤菌结节。在野生生长的侵入性和原生豆类相关的缓生根瘤菌群落之间几乎没有重叠,但是在温室条件下,侵入性豆类可以与多种根瘤菌菌株结节。这些观察结果表明,在野外条件下,这些侵入性豆科植物尽管具有形成这种关联的潜力,但它们目前并未与当地豆科植物的互助者建立联系。但是,如果互助主义者的稀缺限制了范围的扩大,那么这些入侵的豆科植物就可以形成相互联系的混杂关系,可能是入侵过程早期的一个重要因素。总体而言,尽管入侵豆科植物具有与许多根瘤菌菌株相关联的能力,但其侵入性豆科植物具有不同于天然豆科植物的根瘤菌群落,这一发现挑战了有关入侵物种如何获得其共生者的现有假设。因此,这些结果可以为当前和未来的预防和清除入侵物种的努力提供信息。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号