...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Where do the treeless tundra areas of northern highlands fit in the global biome system: toward an ecologically natural subdivision of the tundra biome
【24h】

Where do the treeless tundra areas of northern highlands fit in the global biome system: toward an ecologically natural subdivision of the tundra biome

机译:北部高地无树的苔原地区在全球生物群落系统中的位置:朝着苔原生物群落的生态自然分区发展

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract According to some treatises, arctic and alpine sub-biomes are ecologically similar, whereas others find them highly dissimilar. Most peculiarly, large areas of northern tundra highlands fall outside of the two recent subdivisions of the tundra biome. We seek an ecologically natural resolution to this long-standing and far-reaching problem. We studied broad-scale patterns in climate and vegetation along the gradient from Siberian tundra via northernmost Fennoscandia to the alpine habitats of European middle-latitude mountains, as well as explored those patterns within Fennoscandian tundra based on climate?¢????vegetation patterns obtained from a fine-scale vegetation map. Our analyses reveal that ecologically meaningful January?¢????February snow and thermal conditions differ between different types of tundra. High precipitation and mild winter temperatures prevail on middle-latitude mountains, low precipitation and usually cold winters prevail on high-latitude tundra, and Scandinavian mountains show intermediate conditions. Similarly, heath-like plant communities differ clearly between middle latitude mountains (alpine) and high-latitude tundra vegetation, including its altitudinal extension on Scandinavian mountains. Conversely, high abundance of snowbeds and large differences in the composition of dwarf shrub heaths distinguish the Scandinavian mountain tundra from its counterparts in Russia and the north Fennoscandian inland. The European tundra areas fall into three ecologically rather homogeneous categories: the arctic tundra, the oroarctic tundra of northern heights and mountains, and the genuinely alpine tundra of middle-latitude mountains. Attempts to divide the tundra into two sub-biomes have resulted in major discrepancies and confusions, as the oroarctic areas are included in the arctic tundra in some biogeographic maps and in the alpine tundra in others. Our analyses based on climate and vegetation criteria thus seem to resolve the long-standing biome delimitation problem, help in consistent characterization of research sites, and create a basis for further biogeographic and ecological research in global tundra environments.
机译:摘要根据一些论文,北极和高山亚生物群系在生态学上相似,而其他人则认为它们高度相似。最特别的是,北部的苔原高地大片地区不在苔原生物群系的两个最新分区之内。我们寻求生态上自然的解决方案,以解决这一长期存在且影响深远的问题。我们研究了从西伯利亚冻原到最北端的芬诺斯堪的亚到欧洲中纬度山脉的高山栖息地的梯度,从气候和植被的广泛格局,并基于气候?从精细的植被图获得。我们的分析表明,不同类型的冻原在2月的降雪和热力条件方面具有生态意义。中纬度山区普遍有高降水量和温和的冬季温度,高纬度苔原地区普遍降水量低,通常是寒冷的冬天,而斯堪的纳维亚山脉则处于中等条件。同样,在中纬度山区(高山)和高纬度苔原植被(包括其在斯堪的纳维亚山脉上的垂直扩展)之间,类似荒地的植物群落也明显不同。相反,高高的雪床和矮灌木丛的成分差异很大,这使斯堪的纳维亚的寒带苔原与俄罗斯和北芬诺斯堪的内陆的苔原相区别。欧洲的苔原地区在生态上可以分为三类:北极苔原,北部高地和山脉的兽皮苔原以及中纬度山脉的真正高山苔原。试图将苔原分为两个亚生物群系,导致了重大差异和混乱,因为在某些生物地理地图中,北极地区的原兽皮包括在北极苔原中,而在其他苔原中则包括在高山苔原中。因此,我们基于气候和植被标准的分析似乎解决了长期存在的生物群落划界问题,有助于一致地确定研究地点,并为进一步在全球冻原环境中进行生物地理和生态研究奠定了基础。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号