首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Sympatry or syntopy? Investigating drivers of distribution and co‐occurrence for two imperiled sea turtle species in Gulf of Mexico neritic waters
【24h】

Sympatry or syntopy? Investigating drivers of distribution and co‐occurrence for two imperiled sea turtle species in Gulf of Mexico neritic waters

机译:对称或对立?调查墨西哥湾淡水域中两种濒危海龟物种的分布和共生驱动因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Animals co‐occurring in a region (sympatry) may use the same habitat (syntopy) within that region. A central aim in ecology is determining what factors drive species distributions (i.e., abiotic conditions, dispersal limitations, and/or biotic interactions). Assessing the degree of biotic interactions can be difficult for species with wide ranges at sea. This study investigated the spatial ecology of two sea turtle species that forage on benthic invertebrates in neritic GoM waters: Kemp's ridleys ( Lepidochelys kempii ) and loggerheads ( Caretta caretta ). We used satellite tracking and modeled behavioral modes, then calculated individual home ranges, compared foraging areas, and determined extent of co‐occurrence. Using six environmental variables and principal component analysis, we assessed similarity of chosen foraging sites. We predicted foraging location (eco‐region) based on species, nesting site, and turtle size. For 127 turtles (64 Kemp's ridleys, 63 loggerheads) tracked from 1989 to 2013, foraging home ranges were nine to ten times larger for Kemp's ridleys than for loggerheads. Species intersected off all U.S. coasts and the Yucatán Peninsula, but co‐occurrence areas were small compared to species' distributions. Kemp's ridley foraging home ranges were concentrated in the northern GoM, whereas those for loggerheads were concentrated in the eastern GoM. The two species were different in all habitat variables compared (latitude, longitude, distance to shore, net primary production, mean sea surface temperature, and bathymetry). Nesting site was the single dominant variable that dictated foraging ecoregion. Although Kemp's ridleys and loggerheads may compete for resources, the separation in foraging areas, significant differences in environmental conditions, and importance of nesting location on ecoregion selection (i.e., dispersal ability) indicate that adult females of these species do not interact greatly during foraging and that dispersal and environmental factors more strongly determine their distributions. These species show sympatry in this region but evidence for syntopy was rare.
机译:在一个区域(共生)中同时出现的动物可能在该区域内使用相同的栖息地(同义)。生态学的中心目标是确定驱动物种分布的因素(即非生物条件,扩散限制和/或生物相互作用)。对于海上范围广泛的物种,很难评估生物相互作用的程度。这项研究调查了在GoM水域底栖无脊椎动物中觅食的两种海龟物种的空间生态学:Kemp的ridleys(Lepidochelys kempii)和(Caretta caretta)。我们使用了卫星跟踪和建模的行为模式,然后计算了各自的住所范围,比较了觅食区域,并确定了共现的程度。使用六个环境变量和主成分分析,我们评估了所选觅食地点的相似性。我们根据物种,筑巢地点和海龟大小预测了觅食的地点(生态区域)。从1989年到2013年,对127只海龟(64肯普氏带rid,63)进行了追踪,觅食的家养范围是肯普氏带than的九至十倍。物种在美国所有海岸和尤卡坦半岛附近相交,但与物种分布相比,共生面积较小。肯普(Kemp)的瑞德利(Ridley)觅食家园集中在北部GoM,而顶牛的则集中在东部GoM。比较所有栖息地变量(纬度,经度,到海岸的距离,净初级生产力,平均海面温度和水深),这两个物种是不同的。筑巢地点是决定觅食生态区的唯一显性变量。尽管肯普的牛和牛可能争夺资源,但觅食区的分离,环境条件的显着差异以及筑巢地点对生态区选择的重要性(即分散能力)表明,这些物种的成年雌性在觅食和觅食期间相互作用不大。分散和环境因素更强烈地决定了它们的分布。这些物种在该区域表现出共生性,但是对同位的证据很少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号