首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Winter bait stations as a multispecies survey tool
【24h】

Winter bait stations as a multispecies survey tool

机译:冬季诱饵站作为多物种调查工具

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Winter bait stations are becoming a commonly used technique for multispecies inventory and monitoring but a technical evaluation of their effectiveness is lacking. Bait stations have three components: carcass attractant, remote camera, and hair snare. Our 22,975 km 2 mountainous study area was stratified with a 5 ???? 5 km sampling grid centered on northern Idaho and including portions of Washington, Montana, and British Columbia. From 2010?¢????14, we conducted 563 sampling sessions at 497 bait stations in 453 5 ???? 5 km cells. We evaluated the effectiveness of cameras and hair snare DNA collection at stations to detect species and individual animals, factors affecting DNA viability, the effectiveness of re-visiting stations, and the influence of elevation, seasonality, and latency on species detections. Cameras were more effective at detecting multiple species than DNA hair snaring. Length of deployment time and elevation increased genetic species ID success but individual ID success rates were increased only by collecting hairs earlier in the season. Re-visiting stations did not change camera or genetic species detection results but did increase the number of individual genotypes identified. Marten and fisher were detected quickly while bobcat and coyote showed longer latency to detection. Seasonality significantly affected coyote and bobcat detections but not marten, fisher, or weasel. Multispecies bait station study design should incorporate mixed elevation sites with stratified seasonality. Priority should be given to including cameras as components of bait stations over hair snares, unless there is a specific genetic goal to the study. A hair snare component should be added, however, if individual ID or genetic data are necessary. Winter stations should be deployed a minimum of 45?¢????60 days to allow for detection of low density species and species with long latency to detection times. Hair samples should be collected prior to DNA-degrading late season rain events. Re-visiting stations does not change which species are detected at stations; therefore, studies with objectives to delineate species presence or distribution will be more effective if they focus on deploying more stations across a broader landscape in lieu of surveying the same site multiple times.
机译:摘要冬季诱饵站正在成为多种物种盘存和监测的常用技术,但缺乏对其有效性的技术评估。诱饵站包括三个部分:car体引诱剂,远程摄像头和网罗。我们的22,975 km 2山区研究区域被划分为5 ???? 5公里采样网格,以爱达荷州北部为中心,包括华盛顿,蒙大纳州和不列颠哥伦比亚省的部分地区。从2010年14月起,我们在453个诱饵站的497个诱饵站进行了563次采样。 5公里的单元格。我们评估了在站点检测照相机和头发圈套器DNA的有效性,以检测物种和个体动物,影响DNA生存力的因素,重访站点的有效性以及海拔,季节性和潜伏期对物种检测的影响。照相机比检测DNA头发更有效地检测多种物种。部署时间的长短和海拔的升高增加了遗传物种识别的成功率,但仅通过在季节较早时收集头发,个体识别成功率得以提高。再访站没有改变照相机或遗传物种的检测结果,但确实增加了鉴定出的单个基因型的数量。貂和费舍尔被快速检测到,山猫和土狼显示出更长的检测潜伏期。季节性显着影响土狼和山猫的发现,但不影响貂,渔民或鼬鼠。多物种诱饵站的研究设计应纳入分层分层的混合海拔站点。除非研究有特定的遗传学目标,否则应优先考虑将照相机作为诱饵站的组件,而不是将头发圈套器。但是,如果需要个人ID或遗传数据,则应添加网罗组件。冬季站应至少部署45天至60天,以检测低密度物种和对检测时间有较长延迟的物种。在DNA降解后期雨季之前,应收集头发样本。重新访问站点不会更改在站点检测到的物种;因此,如果目标是确定物种的存在或分布的研究,而不是多次调查同一地点,则将重点放在在更广阔的景观中部署更多的观测站,将会更加有效。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号