首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Power lines, roads, and avian nest survival: effects on predator identity and predation intensity
【24h】

Power lines, roads, and avian nest survival: effects on predator identity and predation intensity

机译:电力线,道路和禽鸟的生存:对捕食者身份和捕食强度的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Anthropogenic alteration of landscapes can affect avian nest success by influencing the abundance, distribution, and behavior of predators. Understanding avian nest predation risk necessitates understanding how landscapes affect predator distribution and behavior. From a sample of 463 nests of 17 songbird species, we evaluated how landscape features (distance to forest edge, unpaved roads, and power lines) influenced daily nest survival. We also used video cameras to identify nest predators at 137 nest predation events and evaluated how landscape features influenced predator identity. Finally, we determined the abundance and distribution of several of the principal predators using surveys and radiotelemetry. Distance to power lines was the best predictor of predator identity: predation by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater), corvids (Corvus sp. and Cyanocitta cristata), racers (Coluber constrictor), and coachwhips (Masticophis flagellum) increased with proximity to power lines, whereas predation by rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta) and raptors decreased. In some cases, predator density may reliably indicate nest predation risk because racers, corvids, and cowbirds frequently used power line right-of-ways. Of five bird species with enough nests to analyze individually, daily nest survival of only indigo buntings (Passerina cyanea) decreased with proximity to power lines, despite predation by most predators at our site being positively associated with power lines. For all nesting species combined, distance to unpaved road was the model that most influenced daily nest survival. This pattern is likely a consequence of rat snakes, the locally dominant nest predator (28% of predation events), rarely using power lines and associated areas. Instead, rat snakes were frequently associated with road edges, indicating that not all edges are functionally similar. Our results suggest that interactions between predators and landscape features are likely to be specific to both the local predators and landscape. Thus, predicting how anthropogenic changes to landscapes affect nesting birds requires that we know more about how landscape changes affect the behavior of nest predators and which nest predators are locally important.
机译:摘要人为的景观变化可以通过影响捕食者的数量,分布和行为来影响禽巢的成功。了解鸟类的巢穴捕食风险需要了解景观如何影响捕食者的分布和行为。我们从17种鸣禽物种的463个巢中取样,评估了景观特征(到森林边缘的距离,未铺砌的道路和电源线)如何影响日常巢的生存。我们还使用摄像机在137个巢捕食事件中识别巢捕食者,并评估了景观特征如何影响捕食者身份。最后,我们使用调查和无线电遥测技术确定了几种主要捕食者的丰度和分布。到电力线的距离是捕食者身份的最佳预测指标:棕头牛bird(Molothrus ater),柯维丘奇(Corvus sp。和Cyanocitta cristata),赛车手(Coluber Constrictor)和长鞭(Masticophis flagellum)的捕食都随着接近权力而增加线,而被捕食的蛇(Elaphe obsoleta)和猛禽的捕食减少。在某些情况下,捕食者的密度可以可靠地表明巢中有被捕食的危险,因为赛鸽,弯曲体和牛鸟经常使用电源线。在五种具有足够巢数以进行单独分析的鸟类中,尽管我们站点上大多数食肉动物的捕食与电力线呈正相关,但只有靛蓝bun(Passerina cyanea)的每日巢生存随着靠近电力线而降低。对于所有筑巢物种而言,到未铺砌道路的距离是影响每日筑巢成活率最大的模型。这种模式可能是老鼠蛇(局部占主导的巢状捕食者,占捕食事件的28%)的结果,很少使用电源线和相关区域。取而代之的是,老鼠蛇经常与道路边缘相关联,这表明并非所有边缘在功能上都相似。我们的结果表明,掠食者与景观特征之间的相互作用可能特定于本地掠食者和景观。因此,要预测景观的人为变化如何影响筑巢的鸟类,就需要我们更多地了解景观变化如何影响巢捕食者的行为以及哪些巢捕食者在当地很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号