...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth and Space Science >Resolving the Model?¢????Observation Discrepancy in the Mesospheric and Stratospheric HO x Chemistry
【24h】

Resolving the Model?¢????Observation Discrepancy in the Mesospheric and Stratospheric HO x Chemistry

机译:解决模型–中层和平流层HO x化学中的观测差异

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We examine the middle atmospheric odd?¢????hydrogen (HO x ) chemistry by comparing the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) OH and HO 2 measurements with a photochemical model simulation. The model underestimates mesospheric OH and HO 2 concentrations if the standard chemical kinetic rates are used, whether the model H 2 O and O 3 are constrained with observations or not. To resolve the discrepancies, we adjust the kinetic rate coefficients of three key reactions (O????+????OH?????¢????????O 2 ????+????H, OH????+????HO 2 ?????¢????????H 2 O????+????O 2 , and H????+????O 2 ????+????M?????¢????????HO 2 ????+????M) and the O 2 photo absorption cross section at Lyman ???± (121.57????nm) using the Bayesian optimal estimation. A much better model?¢????observation agreement can be achieved if the kinetic rate coefficients for H????+????O 2 ????+????M?????¢????????HO 2 ????+????M is increased by 134?¢????310%, and the O 2 photo absorption cross section at Lyman ???± is reduced by 33?¢????54%, while the kinetic rate coefficients for O????+????OH?????¢????????O 2 ????+????H and OH????+????HO 2 ?????¢????????H 2 O????+????O 2 remain consistent with the current laboratory values. The kinetic rate coefficient for H????+????O 2 ????+????M?????¢????????HO 2 ????+????M requires a very large adjustment beyond the uncertainty limits recommended in the NASA Data Evaluation, suggesting the need for future laboratory measurements. An alternative explanation is that the radiative association reaction, H????+????O 2 ?????¢????????HO 2 ????+???? h ????, plays a significant role, which has never been measured. Our results demonstrate that high?¢????quality satellite observations can be used to constrain photochemical parameters and help improve our understanding of atmospheric chemistry.
机译:我们通过比较Aura微波Limb Sounder(MLS)OH和HO 2的测量值与光化学模型模拟结果来检验中间大气中的奇异氢(HO x)化学。如果使用标准化学动力学速率,则无论模型H 2 O和O 3是否受观测约束,该模型都会低估中层OH和HO 2的浓度。为了解决这些差异,我们调整了三个关键反应的动力学速率系数(O 2 + + O + OH-O + O 2 + + + H 2 OH 2 + H 2 O 2 H 2 O 2 + H 2 O 2和H 2O。 ?+ ???? O 2 ???? + ???? M ?????? ¢ ????????? HO 2 ???? + ???? M)和O 2照片用贝叶斯最佳估计在Lyman±(121.57nm)处的吸收截面。如果H 2 + + O 2 O 2 + + M + M的动力学速率系数可以实现更好的观测协议。 HO 2 + M +增加134%,HO 2 + 310%,Lyman±2处的O 2光吸收截面减小33。 O 2的动力学速率系数为54%,而OH的动力学速率系数为O 2。 ?H和OH??+?HO 2 ???? ???? H 2 O ???? +?O 2保持与当前实验室值一致。 H 2 + + O 2 O 2 + + + M M的动力学速率系数M 2-+ HO HO 2-+ + M需要做很大的调整才能超出NASA数据评估中建议的不确定度限制,这表明需要将来进行实验室测量。另一种解释是,辐射缔合反应是H 2 + + O 2 O 2 ¢ ??? ??? 2 HO 2 + + +?。 h ????起着重要的作用,这从未被测量过。我们的结果表明,高质量的卫星观测可用于约束光化学参数,并有助于增进我们对大气化学的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号