...
首页> 外文期刊>Eastern Journal of Medicine >Comparison of ulltrasound guided brachial plexus blockage with general anesthesia and cost analys?s
【24h】

Comparison of ulltrasound guided brachial plexus blockage with general anesthesia and cost analys?s

机译:超声引导臂丛神经阻滞与全身麻醉的比较及费用分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Comparison of ulltrasound guided brachial plexus blockage with general anesthesia and cost analys?s Abdullah Kahraman 1, Nureddin Yüzkat2, Muhammed Bilal Cegin2, Volkan Baydi2 1Department Of Anestesiology, Van State Education And Research Hospital, Health Science University, Ministry Of Health, Van, Turkey 2Department Of Anestesiology And Reanimation, Dursun Odaba? Medical Center, Yüzüncü Y?l University INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to determine which method was superior; general anaesthesia versus brachial plexus block anaesthesia in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery in terms of anaesthesia quality, postoperative complications, patient comfort, patient satisfaction, and cost as in the contemporary world where economical use of resources have become more and more important. METHODS: This study was taken up after local ethics committee approval (12.11.2014 date and No. 2). Among the cases scheduled for upper extremity surgery, 60 patients who are in ASA I-II groups according to the classifications of the American Society of Anaesthetists (ASA), between the ages of 18-65, for whom emergency or elective, single-sided hand, forearm or arm surgery with brachial plexus blockade or general aesthesia planned were included in the study. Two cases were separated into two groups by application order. USG guided peripheral nerve block was done in the first group (BPB group). The other group underwent general anaesthesia (GA group). RESULTS: When the two groups were compared in terms of cost, BPB group was found to be significantly lower than GA Group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: in upper extremity surgery, because brachial plexus blockage provides higher patient satisfaction, better VAS values in acute post-operative period, observation of lesser nausea and vomiting and is more economic compared to general anaesthesia, we believe, regional blocks must be used more often by being included in the routine practices.
机译:超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞与全身麻醉和费用分析的比较:s Abdullah Kahraman 1 ,NureddinYüzkat 2 ,穆罕默德·比拉勒·塞金特 2 ,沃尔坎Baydi 2 1 土耳其卫生部卫生科学大学范州教育与研究医院麻醉科,范,土耳其 2 麻醉科复活,杜尔森·奥达巴(Dursun Odaba)?于因茨克尔尤尔大学医学中心简介:在本研究中,我们旨在确定哪种方法更好;哪些方法更好。就麻醉质量,术后并发症,患者舒适度,患者满意度和成本而言,在上肢外科手术患者中,全身麻醉与臂丛神经阻滞麻醉的区别在当今世界上,资源的经济使用变得越来越重要。方法:本研究是在当地伦理委员会批准后进行的(2014年11月12日,第2号)。根据美国麻醉师协会(ASA)的分类,在计划进行上肢手术的病例中,有60例属于ASA I-II组的患者,年龄在18-65岁之间,急诊或选修为单侧该研究包括计划进行臂丛神经阻滞或计划全身麻醉的手,前臂或手臂手术。根据申请顺序将两个案例分为两组。在第一组(BPB组)中进行USG引导的周围神经阻滞。另一组接受全身麻醉(GA组)。结果:比较两组的成本,发现BPB组明显低于GA组。讨论与结论:在上肢手术中,由于臂丛神经阻滞可提高患者满意度,术后急性期VAS值更高,与全麻相比,观察到的恶心和呕吐更少,而且经济性更高,因此我们认为局部阻滞必须通过被包括在常规实践中而被更频繁地使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号